Home › Research › Health systems and care delivery
The End of Life Option Act: Important Considerations for Pharmacists as California Implements Physician Aid in Dying
Laura A. Petrillo. Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice, 2017-09-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
The law has safeguards intended to ensure that patients are acting autonomously, including a 15-day waiting period between two requests, the requirement that patients meet privately with their physicians to confirm they are acting on their own, and the requirement that patients sign a form within 48 hours of taking the aid-in-dying drug to indicate that it is their choice. In Oregon, individuals who have used physician aid in dying were most often white (96.6%), older adults (median age 71) with a cancer diagnosis (77%).2 Patients most commonly cited concerns about “losing autonomy” (91.6%) and “being less able to participate in activities that make life enjoyable” (89.7%) as motivation for their interest in physician aid in dying, according to data collected via physician report.2One positive outcome of the Death with Dignity Act in Oregon is that 91% of people who received a physician aid in dying prescription between 1998 and 2015 were enrolled in hospice at the time of death,3 which is double the national frequency of hospice enrollment.4 This achievement is a testament to the efforts of the Oregon healthcare community to improve end-of-life care generally in response to the legalization of physician aid in dying.5 One area of concern is the low frequency of psychiatric evaluations (5.3% over 1998–2015) for Oregon residents who received a lethal prescription through the Death with Dignity Act, despite the finding that depression is relatively common among requesters (26% of patients who made a request for physician aid in dying met criteria for clinical depression in one study).6Data from the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance indicate that about five-fold more patients inquire about physician aid in dying than use it.7 There are a variety of reasons for this difference: patients are unable to make it through the process due to illness progression, they do not qualify, they change their mind, or they find relief from their suffering from alternatives like pain control or hospice.7–9 Comprehensive attention to patients' end of life needs by healthcare providers go a long way, not only to support patients and families10 but also, in some cases, to change patients' minds about pursuing physician aid in dying.6Given the similarities between California's End of Life Option Act and the Oregon and Washington laws, California's experience with implementation of physician aid in dying is likely to resemble the other states' in some ways. An opinion poll done in Augus
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Petrillo, L. A. (2017). The End of Life Option Act: Important Considerations for Pharmacists as California Implements Physician Aid in Dying. Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice. https://doi.org/10.37901/jcphp16-00029
Vancouver
Petrillo LA. The End of Life Option Act: Important Considerations for Pharmacists as California Implements Physician Aid in Dying. Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice. 2017. doi:10.37901/jcphp16-00029.
BibTeX
@article{petrillo2017-dedbf80c,
author = {Petrillo, Laura A.},
title = {{The End of Life Option Act: Important Considerations for Pharmacists as California Implements Physician Aid in Dying}},
journal = {Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.37901/jcphp16-00029},
url = {https://doi.org/10.37901/jcphp16-00029}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- The law has safeguards intended to ensure that patients are acting autonomously, including a 15-day waiting period between two requests, the requirement that patients meet privately with their physicians to confirm they are acting on their own, and the requirement that patients sign a form within 48 hours of taking the aid-in-dying drug to indicate that it is their choice.
- In Oregon, individuals who have used physician aid in dying were most often white (96.6%), older adults (median age 71) with a cancer diagnosis (77%).2 Patients most commonly cited concerns about “losing autonomy” (91.6%) and “being less able to participate in activities that make life enjoyable” (8
- An opinion poll done in August 2015 indicated that 76% of Californians support physician aid in dying, but support was higher among white, Asian-American and Latino adults (all ≥75%) than among African-Americans (52.3%).11It is reasonable to expect that as in Oregon and Washington, many more patients will inquire about physician aid in dying than will use it in California.
- Already, since the End of Life Option Act has gone into effect, reporters have raised concern of a shortage of willing physicians in rural counties like Humboldt.13Several institutions have added requirements in addition to the law's safeguards in order to further protect patients from harm, such as mandatory palliative care or mental health evaluations, or credentialing for physicians who participate.(14) These requirements are intended to reduce the risk of patients receiving a prescription as a result of coercion or insufficient evaluation for reversible causes of suffering, but may make it more difficult for patients to obtain a prescription.As described above, participation in the End of Life Option Act is voluntary.
- Bereaved family members in particular are at increased risk of suicide in the period after the patient's death.
Why it matters
This article discusses considerations for pharmacists as California implements its physician aid-in-dying law. It contains no information about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.
Study details
- Effect size96.6%; 91.6%; 89.7%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 27/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice: journal h-index 5 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2017 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.2 citations a year over 11 year(s) since 2017 |
| Impact for its field and year | 0 / 6 | Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Laura A. Petrillo: h-index 19 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | San Francisco VA Medical Center: institution h-index 522 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 0 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete) |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 27 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.37901/jcphp16-00029
- Original source →
- Free full text: Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Related studies in Health systems and care delivery
Also tagged “palliative”
858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “palliative”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.