Home › Research › Disparities
The African American Dementia and Aging Project: an Oregon-based longitudinal study
Allison Lindauer, Raina Croff, Kevin Duff, Nora Mattek, Patrice Fuller, Aimee Pierce, Kalisha Bonds Johnson, Jeffrey Kaye. Frontiers in dementia, 2024-11-18
Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology
AADAPt participants had risk factors for developing dementia in future, such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia, but also reported protective factors such as high social engagement. The AADAPt project offers new insights into aging in older African Americans that includes data on cognition, social engagement, and physical health, which are crucial for understanding the experience of under-represented groups and making future studies more inclusive.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Lindauer, A., Croff, R., Duff, K., Mattek, N., Fuller, P., Pierce, A., et al. (2024). The African American Dementia and Aging Project: an Oregon-based longitudinal study. Frontiers in dementia. https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2024.1498835
Vancouver
Lindauer A, Croff R, Duff K, Mattek N, Fuller P, Pierce A, et al. The African American Dementia and Aging Project: an Oregon-based longitudinal study. Frontiers in dementia. 2024. doi:10.3389/frdem.2024.1498835. PMID: 39629023.
BibTeX
@article{lindauer2024-39629023,
author = {Lindauer, Allison and Croff, Raina and Duff, Kevin and Mattek, Nora and Fuller, Patrice and Pierce, Aimee and Johnson, Kalisha Bonds and Kaye, Jeffrey},
title = {{The African American Dementia and Aging Project: an Oregon-based longitudinal study}},
journal = {Frontiers in dementia},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.3389/frdem.2024.1498835},
pmid = {39629023},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2024.1498835}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- AADAPt participants had risk factors for developing dementia in future, such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia, but also reported protective factors such as high social engagement.
- The AADAPt project offers new insights into aging in older African Americans that includes data on cognition, social engagement, and physical health, which are crucial for understanding the experience of under-represented groups and making future studies more inclusive.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Disparities →
Study details
- Study designlongitudinal study
- Participants177
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 68/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 38 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 68 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in dementia) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A longitudinal study following the same people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 177 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39629023) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 38 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 38 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 68 out of 100. |
| Total | 68 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Disparities
Also tagged “costs”
265 studies in the library carry the topic tag “costs”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 265 tagged studies.