Home › Research › Treatments
Structural properties of Abeta protofibrils stabilized by a small molecule
Williams AD, Sega M, Chen M, Kheterpal I, Geva M, Berthelier V, Kaleta DT, Cook KD et al.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005-05-09
Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies
Metastable oligomeric and protofibrillar forms of amyloidogenic proteins have been implicated as on-pathway assembly intermediates in amyloid formation and as the major toxic species in a number of amyloid diseases including Alzheimer's disease. We describe here a chemical biology approach to structural analysis of Abeta protofibrils. Library screening yielded several molecules that stimulate Abeta aggregation. One of these compounds, calmidazolium chloride (CLC), rapidly and efficiently converts Abeta(1-40) monomers into clusters of protofibrils. As monitored by electron microscopy, these protofibrils persist for days when incubated in PBS at 37 degrees C, with a slow transition to fibrillar structures apparent only after several weeks. Like normal protofibrils, the CLC-Abeta aggregates exhibit a low thioflavin T response. Like Abeta fibrils, the clustered protofibrils bind the anti-amyloid Ab WO1. The CLC-Abeta aggregates exhibit the same protection from hydrogen-deuterium exchange as do protofibrils isolated from a spontaneous Abeta fibril formation reaction: approximately 12 of the 39 Abeta(1-40) backbone amide protons are protected from exchange in the protofibril, compared with approximately twice that number in amyloid fibrils. Scanning proline mutagenesis analysis shows that the Abeta molecule in these protofibrillar assemblies exhibits the same flexible N and C termini as do mature amyloid fibrils. The major difference in Abeta conformation between fibrils and protofibrils is added structural definition in the 22-29 segment in the fibril. Besides aiding structural analysis, compounds capable of facilitating oligomer and protofibril formation might have therapeutic potential, if they act to sequester Abeta in a form and/or location that cannot engage the toxic pathway.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Williams, A. D., Sega, M., Chen, M., Kheterpal, I., Geva, M., Berthelier, V., et al. (2005). Structural properties of Abeta protofibrils stabilized by a small molecule. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408582102
Vancouver
Williams AD, Sega M, Chen M, Kheterpal I, Geva M, Berthelier V, et al. Structural properties of Abeta protofibrils stabilized by a small molecule. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408582102. PMID: 15883377.
BibTeX
@article{williams2005-15883377,
author = {Williams, A. D. and Sega, M. and Chen, M. and Kheterpal, I. and Geva, M. and Berthelier, V. and Kaleta, D. T. and Cook, K. D. and others},
title = {{Structural properties of Abeta protofibrils stabilized by a small molecule}},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
year = {2005},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.0408582102},
pmid = {15883377},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408582102}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- The CLC-Abeta aggregates exhibit the same protection from hydrogen-deuterium exchange as do protofibrils isolated from a spontaneous Abeta fibril formation reaction: approximately 12 of the 39 Abeta(1-40) backbone amide protons are protected from exchange in the protofibril, compared with approximately twice that number in amyloid fibrils.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2005 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 15883377) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Treatments
Also tagged “presenilin”
343 studies in the library carry the topic tag “presenilin”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 343 tagged studies.