Ribosome dysfunction is an early event in Alzheimer's disease
Ding Q, Markesbery WR, Chen Q, Li F, Keller JN.. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2005-10-01
Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive and devastating disorder that is often preceded by mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In the present study, we report that in multiple cortical areas of MCI and AD subjects, there is a significant impairment in ribosome function that is not observed in the cerebellum of the same subjects. The impairment in ribosome function is associated with a decreased rate and capacity for protein synthesis, decreased ribosomal RNA and tRNA levels, and increased RNA oxidation. No alteration in the level of initiation factors was observed in the brain regions exhibiting impairments in protein synthesis. Together, these data indicate for the first time that impairments in protein synthesis may be one of the earliest neurochemical alterations in AD and directly demonstrate that the polyribosome complex is adversely affected early in the development of AD. These data have important implications for AD studies involving proteomics and studies analyzing proteolysis in AD, indicate that oxidative damage may contribute to decreased protein synthesis, and suggest a role for alterations in protein synthesis as a novel contributor to the onset and development of AD.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Ding, Q., Markesbery, W. R., Chen, Q., Li, F., & Keller, J. N. (2005). Ribosome dysfunction is an early event in Alzheimer's disease. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3040-05.2005
Vancouver
Ding Q, Markesbery WR, Chen Q, Li F, Keller JN. Ribosome dysfunction is an early event in Alzheimer's disease. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2005. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3040-05.2005. PMID: 16207876.
BibTeX
@article{ding2005-16207876,
author = {Ding, Q. and Markesbery, W. R. and Chen, Q. and Li, F. and Keller, J. N.},
title = {{Ribosome dysfunction is an early event in Alzheimer's disease}},
journal = {The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience},
year = {2005},
doi = {10.1523/jneurosci.3040-05.2005},
pmid = {16207876},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3040-05.2005}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- In the present study, we report that in multiple cortical areas of MCI and AD subjects, there is a significant impairment in ribosome function that is not observed in the cerebellum of the same subjects.
- The impairment in ribosome function is associated with a decreased rate and capacity for protein synthesis, decreased ribosomal RNA and tRNA levels, and increased RNA oxidation.
- These data have important implications for AD studies involving proteomics and studies analyzing proteolysis in AD, indicate that oxidative damage may contribute to decreased protein synthesis, and suggest a role for alterations in protein synthesis as a novel contributor to the onset and development of AD.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Genetics →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2005 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 16207876) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Genetics
Also tagged “mitochondrial”
275 studies in the library carry the topic tag “mitochondrial”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 275 tagged studies.