Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 54 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers

Differential FTP-PET signal patterns showed significant negative associations with domain-specific annual rates of decline. Higher temporo-parietal FTP-PET SUVR was associated with faster decline in episodic memory, while higher left anterior temporal SUVR was associated with faster decline in semantic memory. FTP-PET signal in a left-dominant fronto-temporal pattern was associated with faster decline in language, while FTP-PET signal in a right-dominant fronto-parietal pattern was associated with faster decline in praxis. Executive decline showed limited spatial associations with FTP-PET. Overall, regional and voxel-wise analyses identified similar pairwise associations between FTP-PET signal and domain-specific longitudinal decline. Baseline MRI showed weaker associations with domain-specific cognitive decline than FTP-PET, and did not mediate the predictive effect of the latter. Differential regional tau-PET signal patterns were associated with domain-specific cognitive decline in MCI and early AD dementia. Tau-PET may be a useful precision medicine tool to support individualized predictions of cognitive decline trajectories in early symptomatic AD.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 54/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 30 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 54 of 100. Total 54 of 100.30 of the 56 points we could judge = 54 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 30 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 54 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer's research & therapy)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41053874)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 30 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 30 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 54 out of 100.
Total 54 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Malpetti, M., Rathore, S., Iaccarino, L., La Joie, R., Tronchin, G., Wessels, A. M., et al. (2025). Regional tau PET patterns predict prospective domain-specific cognitive decline in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's research & therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01868-7

Vancouver

Malpetti M, Rathore S, Iaccarino L, La Joie R, Tronchin G, Wessels AM, et al. Regional tau PET patterns predict prospective domain-specific cognitive decline in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2025. doi:10.1186/s13195-025-01868-7. PMID: 41053874.

BibTeX

@article{malpetti2025-41053874,
  author  = {Malpetti, Maura and Rathore, Saima and Iaccarino, Leonardo and La Joie, Renaud and Tronchin, Giulia and Wessels, Alette M and Sims, John R and Pontecorvo, Michael J and others},
  title   = {{Regional tau PET patterns predict prospective domain-specific cognitive decline in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's research \& therapy},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1186/s13195-025-01868-7},
  pmid    = {41053874},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01868-7}
}

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “18f”

319 studies in the library carry the topic tag “18f”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 319 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →