Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 26 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Small area estimates (SAEs) are increasingly used in public health to assess disease and health behavior prevalence rates at more local levels of geography, better informing public health decision-making and interventions. SAEs for health outcomes are largely produced by either the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using the federal, standardized Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) or by a few jurisdictions using state or local health surveys. Missouri has the unique opportunity to develop its own health outcome SAEs using its state-specific health survey, the Missouri County-Level Study (MO CLS); however, to date, no framework exists for deriving health outcome SAEs from the MO CLS. This exploratory pilot project aims to bridge this gap so Missouri public health actors can access timely and flexible SAEs to inform crucial public health action. Using a multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) approach, a unit-level multilevel logistic model was fit for four chronic disease outcomes using Bayesian inference. Weighted and unweighted models were estimated for each outcome, and poststratification was applied to produce SAEs for each Missouri Zip Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA). Internal and external validation assessments were conducted to evaluate the consistency and accuracy of model-based SAEs. Validation results demonstrate higher internal consistency between the weighted SAEs and direct survey estimates at the state and county levels, while the unweighted SAEs more effectively generalize diagnosis-based outcomes such as diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and high blood pressure. Overall, the SAE models highlight areas of need consistent with external sources and subject-matter expertise while providing nuance in areas that could otherwise have been overlooked at the county level. This study ultimately provides a sustainable and scalable framework for Missouri public health practitioners and demonstrates that using MO CLS data can produce timely, flexible SAEs to guide local resource allocation and help reduce the burden of chronic disease on the Missouri population.

Key findings

Why it matters

This pilot project developed a method to estimate chronic disease prevalence at the ZIP code level in Missouri using a state health survey. It provides no information on treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 26/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent left out, no data; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 19 of the 73 points it could be judged on, which is 26 of 100. Total 26 of 100.19 of the 73 points we could judge = 26 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on how recent, journal's citation record, citations per year, impact for its field and year, senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 19 of the 73 points we could judge it on, which is 26 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Not indexed)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent — / 5 No year recorded — left out of this score
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Sarah Kathleen Finley holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 19 / 73 Scored on 14 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 19 of the 73 points we could judge it on is 26 out of 100.
Total 26 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no year, journal, so the citation leaves them out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Finley, S. K. (n.d.). Refining small area estimates for big impacts : modeling ZCTA-level chronic disease prevalence rates using Missouri's county-level study. https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/112656

Vancouver

Finley SK. Refining small area estimates for big impacts : modeling ZCTA-level chronic disease prevalence rates using Missouri's county-level study. doi:10.32469/10355/112656.

BibTeX

@article{finley-6792eb83,
  author = {Finley, Sarah Kathleen},
  title  = {{Refining small area estimates for big impacts : modeling ZCTA-level chronic disease prevalence rates using Missouri's county-level study}},
  doi    = {10.32469/10355/112656},
  url    = {https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/112656}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →