Home › Research › Risk factors
Refining small area estimates for big impacts : modeling ZCTA-level chronic disease prevalence rates using Missouri's county-level study
Sarah Kathleen Finley. Not indexed
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Small area estimates (SAEs) are increasingly used in public health to assess disease and health behavior prevalence rates at more local levels of geography, better informing public health decision-making and interventions. SAEs for health outcomes are largely produced by either the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using the federal, standardized Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) or by a few jurisdictions using state or local health surveys. Missouri has the unique opportunity to develop its own health outcome SAEs using its state-specific health survey, the Missouri County-Level Study (MO CLS); however, to date, no framework exists for deriving health outcome SAEs from the MO CLS. This exploratory pilot project aims to bridge this gap so Missouri public health actors can access timely and flexible SAEs to inform crucial public health action. Using a multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) approach, a unit-level multilevel logistic model was fit for four chronic disease outcomes using Bayesian inference. Weighted and unweighted models were estimated for each outcome, and poststratification was applied to produce SAEs for each Missouri Zip Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA). Internal and external validation assessments were conducted to evaluate the consistency and accuracy of model-based SAEs. Validation results demonstrate higher internal consistency between the weighted SAEs and direct survey estimates at the state and county levels, while the unweighted SAEs more effectively generalize diagnosis-based outcomes such as diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and high blood pressure. Overall, the SAE models highlight areas of need consistent with external sources and subject-matter expertise while providing nuance in areas that could otherwise have been overlooked at the county level. This study ultimately provides a sustainable and scalable framework for Missouri public health practitioners and demonstrates that using MO CLS data can produce timely, flexible SAEs to guide local resource allocation and help reduce the burden of chronic disease on the Missouri population.
Key findings
- Validation results demonstrate higher internal consistency between the weighted SAEs and direct survey estimates at the state and county levels, while the unweighted SAEs more effectively generalize diagnosis-based outcomes such as diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and high blood pressure.
- Overall, the SAE models highlight areas of need consistent with external sources and subject-matter expertise while providing nuance in areas that could otherwise have been overlooked at the county level.
Why it matters
This pilot project developed a method to estimate chronic disease prevalence at the ZIP code level in Missouri using a state health survey. It provides no information on treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Risk factors, ranked →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 26/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on how recent, journal's citation record, citations per year, impact for its field and year, senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 19 of the 73 points we could judge it on, which is 26 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Not indexed) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | — / 5 | No year recorded — left out of this score |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 0 / 7 | Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Sarah Kathleen Finley holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 0 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete) |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 19 / 73 | Scored on 14 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 19 of the 73 points we could judge it on is 26 out of 100. |
| Total | 26 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no year, journal, so the citation leaves them out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Finley, S. K. (n.d.). Refining small area estimates for big impacts : modeling ZCTA-level chronic disease prevalence rates using Missouri's county-level study. https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/112656
Vancouver
Finley SK. Refining small area estimates for big impacts : modeling ZCTA-level chronic disease prevalence rates using Missouri's county-level study. doi:10.32469/10355/112656.
BibTeX
@article{finley-6792eb83,
author = {Finley, Sarah Kathleen},
title = {{Refining small area estimates for big impacts : modeling ZCTA-level chronic disease prevalence rates using Missouri's county-level study}},
doi = {10.32469/10355/112656},
url = {https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/112656}
}