Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

PET imaging demonstrated high cortical brain uptake of all 3 radiotracers in Tg-ArcSwe mice. Labeling with the metals 89Zr and 64Cu produced the highest overall brain signal in both Tg-ArcSwe and WT mice. [89Zr]Zr-DFO*-Lec-Fab8D3 and [124I]I-Lec-Fab8D3 demonstrated the greatest discrimination between Tg-ArcSwe and WT mice, with [124I]I-Lec-Fab8D3 exhibiting the most pronounced regional differences. Ex vivo analyses corroborated the PET findings, and immunostaining confirmed radiotracer colocalization with Aβ deposits. Immuno-PET imaging with radiolabeled Lec-Fab8D3 enables specific detection of brain Aβ pathology. Because of its residualizing properties, 89Zr produced the highest overall signal, whereas 124I yielded greater regional contrast, despite lower total brain signal. These findings enhance our understanding of the intrabrain distribution of bispecific antibodies and highlight the importance of radionuclide selection and its impact on immuno-PET outcomes.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

van den Broek, S. L., Bratteby, K., Aguilar, X., Tran, T., Syvänen, S., & Sehlin, D. (2025). Radionuclide Selection Influences Imaging Outcomes in Immuno-PET with a Brain-Penetrating Anti–Amyloid-β Antibody. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.271194

Vancouver

van den Broek SL, Bratteby K, Aguilar X, Tran T, Syvänen S, Sehlin D. Radionuclide Selection Influences Imaging Outcomes in Immuno-PET with a Brain-Penetrating Anti–Amyloid-β Antibody. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2025. doi:10.2967/jnumed.125.271194. PMID: 41381239.

BibTeX

@article{vandenbroek2025-41381239,
  author  = {van den Broek, Sara Lopes and Bratteby, Klas and Aguilar, Ximena and Tran, Thuy and Syvänen, Stina and Sehlin, Dag},
  title   = {{Radionuclide Selection Influences Imaging Outcomes in Immuno-PET with a Brain-Penetrating Anti–Amyloid-β Antibody}},
  journal = {Journal of Nuclear Medicine},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.2967/jnumed.125.271194},
  pmid    = {41381239},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.271194}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In Tg-ArcSwe mice, immuno-PET with radiolabeled Lec-Fab8D3 enabled specific detection of brain Aβ pathology, with 89Zr producing the highest overall signal and 124I yielding greater regional contrast. These findings are from animal studies and concern imaging of amyloid, not treatment, cure or prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 32/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 32 of 100.32 of 100 points earned68 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Nuclear Medicine)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Nuclear Medicine: journal h-index 230 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Dag Sehlin: h-index 38 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Karolinska Institutet: institution h-index 1,477 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41381239)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 32 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “machine”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “machine”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →