Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment

The final sample comprised 2478 individuals, of which 59 (2.4%) were Asian, 63 (2.5%) were Black, and 2356 (95.1%) were White. The mean (SD) age at initial visit was 65.3 (9.4) years and symptom duration at initial visit was 67.5 (35.6) months. Asian and Black individuals were considerably underrepresented, comprising a small percent of the sample. Black individuals had a higher degree of dementia severity on FTLD-CDR (β = 0.64; SE = 0.24; P = .006) and FTLD-CDR sum of boxes (β = 1.21; SE = 0.57; P = .03) and greater functional impairment (β = 3.83; SE = 1.49; P = .01). There were no differences on FTLD-CDR and Functional Assessment Scale between Asian and White individuals. Black individuals were found to exhibit a higher frequency of delusions, agitation, and depression (delusions: odds ratio [OR], 2.18; 95% CI, 1.15-3.93; P = .01; agitation: OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.03-2.93; P = .04; depression: OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.05-2.92; P = .03). Asian individuals were found to exhibit a higher frequency of apathy (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.09-3.78; P = .03), nighttime behaviors (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.01-2.91; P = .04), and appetite/eating (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.17-3.47; P = .01) compared to White individuals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This exploratory study suggests there are racial disparities in dementia severity, functional impairment, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Future work must address racial disparities and their underlying determinants as well as the lack of representation of racially minoritized individuals in nationally representative dementia registries.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 66/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 37 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 66 of 100. Total 66 of 100.37 of the 56 points we could judge = 66 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 37 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 66 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA neurology)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 2,478 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37695629)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 37 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 37 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 66 out of 100.
Total 66 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Jin, H. A., McMillan, C. T., Yannatos, I., Fisher, L., Rhodes, E., Jacoby, S. F., et al. (2023). Racial Differences in Clinical Presentation in Individuals Diagnosed With Frontotemporal Dementia. JAMA neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3093

Vancouver

Jin HA, McMillan CT, Yannatos I, Fisher L, Rhodes E, Jacoby SF, et al. Racial Differences in Clinical Presentation in Individuals Diagnosed With Frontotemporal Dementia. JAMA neurology. 2023. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3093. PMID: 37695629.

BibTeX

@article{jin2023-37695629,
  author  = {Jin, Hannah A and McMillan, Corey T and Yannatos, Isabel and Fisher, Lauren and Rhodes, Emma and Jacoby, Sarah F and Irwin, David J and Massimo, Lauren},
  title   = {{Racial Differences in Clinical Presentation in Individuals Diagnosed With Frontotemporal Dementia}},
  journal = {JAMA neurology},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3093},
  pmid    = {37695629},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3093}
}

Related studies in Disparities

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →