Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Protective effect of lipoic acid against oxidative stress is mediated by Keap1/Nrf2-dependent heme oxygenase-1 induction in the RGC-5 cellline
Koriyama Y, Nakayama Y, Matsugo S, Kato S.. Brain research, 2013-01-04
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Oxidative stress plays a key role in neurodegeneration of CNS neurons such as in Alzheimer disease, Parkinson's disease and glaucoma. R-α-lipoic acid (R-LA) has been shown to have a neuroprotective effect through its antioxidant activity. However, the mechanism underlying its neuroprotection is totally unknown in retinal neurons. In this study, we show that R-LA has a dramatic neuroprotective effect against oxidative stress-induced death of the retinal neuronal RGC-5 cell line. We observed that R-LA induces the expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) by promoting the translocation of NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) to the nucleus. We examined the mechanism underlying HO-1 induction by R-LA by focusing on downstream signaling pathways. We found that R-LA activates Akt, and HO-1 induction by R-LA (involving Nrf2 translocation to the nucleus) was suppressed by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors. In addition, R-LA produced reactive oxygen species (ROS), including hydrogen peroxide. Pretreatment with a ROS scavenger or a NADPH oxidase inhibitor suppressed R-LA-induced Nrf2 translocation to the nucleus and HO-1 induction. These results suggest that ROS production triggered by R-LA might modify Kelch-like ECH-associated protein (Keap1), which in turn induces HO-1 expression through the PI3K signaling pathway. Furthermore, R-LA significantly attenuated cell death and accumulation of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4HNE) in the retina induced by optic nerve injury in vivo through an HO-1 activity-dependent mechanism. These data demonstrate for the first time that R-LA exerts a neuroprotective effect against oxidative stress in retinal neurons in vitro and in vivo by inducing HO-1 through Keap1/Nrf2 signaling.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Koriyama, Y., Nakayama, Y., Matsugo, S., & Kato, S. (2013). Protective effect of lipoic acid against oxidative stress is mediated by Keap1/Nrf2-dependent heme oxygenase-1 induction in the RGC-5 cellline. Brain research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.12.041
Vancouver
Koriyama Y, Nakayama Y, Matsugo S, Kato S. Protective effect of lipoic acid against oxidative stress is mediated by Keap1/Nrf2-dependent heme oxygenase-1 induction in the RGC-5 cellline. Brain research. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.12.041. PMID: 23295186.
BibTeX
@article{koriyama2013-23295186,
author = {Koriyama, Y. and Nakayama, Y. and Matsugo, S. and Kato, S.},
title = {{Protective effect of lipoic acid against oxidative stress is mediated by Keap1/Nrf2-dependent heme oxygenase-1 induction in the RGC-5 cellline}},
journal = {Brain research},
year = {2013},
doi = {10.1016/j.brainres.2012.12.041},
pmid = {23295186},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.12.041}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- We observed that R-LA induces the expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) by promoting the translocation of NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) to the nucleus.
- We found that R-LA activates Akt, and HO-1 induction by R-LA (involving Nrf2 translocation to the nucleus) was suppressed by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors.
- These results suggest that ROS production triggered by R-LA might modify Kelch-like ECH-associated protein (Keap1), which in turn induces HO-1 expression through the PI3K signaling pathway.
- Furthermore, R-LA significantly attenuated cell death and accumulation of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4HNE) in the retina induced by optic nerve injury in vivo through an HO-1 activity-dependent mechanism.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Brain research) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2013 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 23295186) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Brain scans and imaging
Also tagged “protective”
4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “protective”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.