Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Context Impairments of color discrimination (CD) and contrast sensitivity are established signs of Parkinson disease (PD), but their temporal evolution has not been studied. Objective To determine whether there is progressive, longitudinal deterioration of color discrimination (CD) and contrast sensitivity (CS) in PD. Design A prospective study. Setting Tertiary care center-based sample of PD patients without dementia with normal visual acuity (Snellen fraction >0.6 in the best eye). Main outcome measures With a mean +/- SD interval of 19.8 +/- 2.8 months, the following tests were applied twice in 28 patients: the Lanthony D15 test and the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue test as tests of CD and the monocular and binocular Pelli-Robson test and the binocular Vistech tables as tests of CS. Results There was deterioration of both CD (Farnsworth Munsell 100 hue test: P =.002) and CS (binocular Vistech test at a spatial frequency of 6 cycles per degree, P<.001). Both deficits correlated with age, and the chromatic deficit additionally correlated with higher impairment of motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor section, P =.04) and activities of daily life (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale activities of daily living section, P =.006). Patients with the highest pathologic psychiatric rating score (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) performed worse on both CS (P =.02) and CD (P =.01) at the second examination. Conclusions Impairments of CD and CS in PD are progressive over time. Visual deficits may influence overall motor function and lead to enhanced motor impairment.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Diederich, N. J., Raman, R., Leurgans, S., & Goetz, C. G. (2002). Progressive worsening of spatial and chromatic processing deficits in Parkinson disease. Archives of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.59.8.1249

Vancouver

Diederich NJ, Raman R, Leurgans S, Goetz CG. Progressive worsening of spatial and chromatic processing deficits in Parkinson disease. Archives of neurology. 2002. doi:10.1001/archneur.59.8.1249. PMID: 12164720.

BibTeX

@article{diederich2002-12164720,
  author  = {Diederich, N. J. and Raman, R. and Leurgans, S. and Goetz, C. G.},
  title   = {{Progressive worsening of spatial and chromatic processing deficits in Parkinson disease}},
  journal = {Archives of neurology},
  year    = {2002},
  doi     = {10.1001/archneur.59.8.1249},
  pmid    = {12164720},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.59.8.1249}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 59/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 34 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 59 of 100. Total 59 of 100.34 of the 58 points we could judge = 59 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 34 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 59 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Archives of neurology)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2002 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 1 / 4 28 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12164720)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 34 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 34 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 59 out of 100.
Total 59 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “longitudinal”

5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “longitudinal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →