This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

36/100

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

Stroke is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. The epidemiologic association between elevated serum cholesterol and stroke risk is controversial. However, recent secondary prevention studies with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have demonstrated a significant reduction in ischemic stroke without an increase in hemorrhagic stroke. Statins probably reduce stroke by a variety of mechanisms, including modulation of precerebral atherothrombosis in the aorta and the carotid artery, thus preventing plaque disruption and artery-to-artery thromboembolism. Statins also improve endothelial homeostasis by increasing the bioavailability of nitric oxide, which orchestrates the paracrine antiatherosclerotic functions of the endothelium. Studies in experimental models of ischemic stroke show that statin therapy reduces brain infarct size and improves neurologic outcome by directly upregulating brain endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Putative anti-inflammatory actions of statins may also contribute to neuroprotection and stroke prevention. Although the clinical benefit of statins largely depends on lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, accumulating data indicate that many of the pleiotropic effects of statins are attributable to the cellular consequences of depletion of intermediates in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway (isoprenoids). These molecules play fundamental roles in cell growth, signal transduction, and mitogenesis. In addition to reducing stroke risk, emerging data suggest that statins may reduce dementia. Further studies are needed to fully address the role of statins in the prevention of stroke in patients without established vascular disease and the role of cholesterol modulation in the treatment of dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Vaughan, C. J. (2003). Prevention of stroke and dementia with statins: Effects beyond lipid lowering. The American journal of cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03270-8

Vancouver

Vaughan CJ. Prevention of stroke and dementia with statins: Effects beyond lipid lowering. The American journal of cardiology. 2003. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03270-8. PMID: 12615295.

BibTeX

@article{vaughan2003-12615295,
  author  = {Vaughan, C. J.},
  title   = {{Prevention of stroke and dementia with statins: Effects beyond lipid lowering}},
  journal = {The American journal of cardiology},
  year    = {2003},
  doi     = {10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03270-8},
  pmid    = {12615295},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03270-8}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

How to read this study

Design: this is a narrative review. It summarises a field without a fixed search method, so it shows how authors read the evidence rather than measuring it. Use it to find the primary studies, not as a result in itself.
Size: the record gives no participant count. Look for one in the original before trusting a pattern.
Effect: the record gives no effect size, so the summary above cannot say how large any difference was.

What the evidence grade means here

This page is graded low. alzhub.org assigns the grade automatically from keywords in the abstract, not from reading the paper. Low means the abstract matched neither pattern. It is the default label, and it does not mean the work is poor; many sound lab and imaging papers land here. It can add at most 5 of the 100 points in the study score, and it is a label about design, not a verdict on whether the findings are true.

New to reading papers? Six questions to ask of any Alzheimer’s study · how we score.

Key findings

However, recent secondary prevention studies with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have demonstrated a significant reduction in ischemic stroke without an increase in hemorrhagic stroke.
Although the clinical benefit of statins largely depends on lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, accumulating data indicate that many of the pleiotropic effects of statins are attributable to the cellular consequences of depletion of intermediates in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway (isoprenoids).
In addition to reducing stroke risk, emerging data suggest that statins may reduce dementia.

New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →

Study details

Evidence strengthLow

How this study scored 36/100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.

Component	Points	Why
Journal tier	7 / 10	Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The American journal of cardiology)
Journal's citation record	— / 4	No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design	0 / 12	No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence	1 / 5	Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation	10 / 10	Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent	1 / 5	2003 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size	0 / 4	Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported	0 / 3	No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people	0 / 3	Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded	0 / 2	No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited	— / 7	No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year	— / 5	No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year	— / 6	No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here	— / 6	Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited	— / 4	No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record	— / 4	Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record	— / 3	No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration	— / 3	Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed	2 / 2	Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12615295)
Free to read	0 / 2	Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points	21 / 58	Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100.
Total	36 / 100	—

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development from nearby years

Also tagged “lipid-lowering”

5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “lipid-lowering”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →