Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

MA-PD enrollees had significantly lower utilization of PIMs than standalone PDP enrollees: a 0.7 percentage-point [95% CI: 0.5, 0.8] lower prevalence of potentially harmful drug-disease interactions in older adults with dementia; a 3.1 percentage-point [2.6, 3.5] lower prevalence of potentially harmful drug-disease interactions in older adults with dementia and a history of falls; and a 0.5 percentage-point [0.4, 0.6] lower prevalence of high-risk medications in older adults. MA-PD enrollees with dementia experienced consistently lower prevalence of PIM use than those in PDP. As Medicare advantage enrollment continues to grow, it will be increasingly important to identify and leverage the features of MA-PD plans that promote safe medication prescribing for Medicare beneficiaries with dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Raver, E., Jung, J., Carlin, C., Feldman, R., Retchin, S. M., & Xu, W. (2025). Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Patients With Dementia in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000002160

Vancouver

Raver E, Jung J, Carlin C, Feldman R, Retchin SM, Xu W. Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Patients With Dementia in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. Medical Care. 2025. doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000002160.

BibTeX

@article{raver2025-35a52bac,
  author  = {Raver, Eli and Jung, Jeah and Carlin, Caroline and Feldman, Roger and Retchin, Sheldon M. and Xu, Wendy},
  title   = {{Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Patients With Dementia in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage}},
  journal = {Medical Care},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1097/mlr.0000000000002160},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000002160}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that people with dementia in Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans were prescribed potentially inappropriate medications less often than those in standalone Medicare drug plans. It does not test any treatment for Alzheimer's disease itself, but it suggests that features of certain Medicare plans may support safer prescribing for people with dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 30/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 30 of 100.30 of 100 points earned70 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Medical Care)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Medical Care: journal h-index 273 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Wendy Xu: h-index 12 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Minnesota: institution h-index 1,568 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 30 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →