Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 71 out of 100. How common it is

Reviewed as evidence on: Isolated REM sleep behaviour disorder and later Parkinson's/DLB 3 studies (what the news said). Being listed means the study bears on the question, not that it agrees with the news.

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Objective To precisely delineate clinical risk factors for conversion from idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) to Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy, in order to enable practical planning and stratification of neuroprotective trials against neurodegenerative synucleinopathy. Methods In a 10-year prospective cohort, we tested prodromal Parkinson disease markers in 89 patients with idiopathic RBD. With Kaplan-Meier analysis, we calculated risk of neurodegenerative synucleinopathy, and using Cox proportional hazards, tested the ability of prodromal markers to identify patients at higher disease risk. By combining predictive markers, we then designed stratification strategies to optimally select patients for definitive neuroprotective trials. Results The risk of defined neurodegenerative synucleinopathy was high: 30% developed disease at 3 years, rising to 66% at 7.5 years. Advanced age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07), olfactory loss (HR = 2.8), abnormal color vision (HR = 3.1), subtle motor dysfunction (HR = 3.9), and nonuse of antidepressants (HR = 3.5) identified higher risk of disease conversion. However, mild cognitive impairment (HR = 1.8), depression (HR = 0.63), Parkinson personality, treatment with clonazepam (HR = 1.3) or melatonin (HR = 0.55), autonomic markers, and sex (HR = 1.37) did not clearly predict clinical neurodegeneration. Stratification with prodromal markers increased risk of neurodegenerative disease conversion by 200%, and combining markers allowed sample size reduction in neuroprotective trials by >40%. With a moderately effective agent (HR = 0.5), trials with fewer than 80 subjects per group can demonstrate definitive reductions in neurodegenerative disease. Conclusions Using stratification with simply assessed markers, it is now not only possible, but practical to include patients with RBD in neuroprotective trials against Parkinson disease, multiple system atrophy, and dementia with Lewy bodies.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Postuma, R. B., Gagnon, J. F., Bertrand, J. A., Génier Marchand, D., & Montplaisir, J. Y. (2015). Parkinson risk in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder: preparing for neuroprotective trials. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000001364

Vancouver

Postuma RB, Gagnon JF, Bertrand JA, Génier Marchand D, Montplaisir JY. Parkinson risk in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder: preparing for neuroprotective trials. Neurology. 2015. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001364. PMID: 25681454.

BibTeX

@article{postuma2015-25681454,
  author  = {Postuma, R. B. and Gagnon, J. F. and Bertrand, J. A. and Génier Marchand, D. and Montplaisir, J. Y.},
  title   = {{Parkinson risk in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder: preparing for neuroprotective trials}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2015},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000001364},
  pmid    = {25681454},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000001364}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In people with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder, the risk of developing a neurodegenerative synucleinopathy was 30% at 3 years and 66% at 7.5 years. Certain markers (advanced age, olfactory loss, abnormal color vision, subtle motor dysfunction, and nonuse of antidepressants) identified higher risk, and combining markers increased risk by 200%, which could help select patients for future neuroprotective trials.

Study details

How this study scored 71/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 71 of 100.71 of 100 points earned29 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a prospective cohort study, followed forward from enrollment. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A prospective cohort study, followed forward from enrollment
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2015 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 89 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 438 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 33.7 citations a year over 13 year(s) since 2015
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 33.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 15 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 78 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Jacques Yves Montplaisir: h-index 117 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 McGill University: institution h-index 1,373 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 25681454)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 71 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

15 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in How common it is

Also tagged “irbd-and-lewy-prodrome”

3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “irbd-and-lewy-prodrome”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →