Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100. Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Two groups of subjects, 14 young (ages 20 to 31 years) and 14 adults (ages 32 to 54 years), both groups with Down Syndrome, were examined on a matching and naming olfactory task. On the former, subjects were required to recognize among four a previously sniffed odour, while on the latter they had to label an odour by choosing among four alternatives provided by the examiner. Analysis indicated that the adults with Down Syndrome scored worse than the young group on both tasks and that the impairment of the two groups was more pronounced on the matching task. On considering the similarity between the neurodegenerative brain pathology exhibited by Alzheimer patients and Down subjects and a recent observation that the former show pathological changes also in the olfactory epithelium (neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles), these two olfactory tasks could represent a useful noninvasive diagnostic method.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Zucco, G. M., & Negrin, N. S. (1994). Olfactory deficits in Down subjects: a link with Alzheimer disease. Perceptual and motor skills. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.627

Vancouver

Zucco GM, Negrin NS. Olfactory deficits in Down subjects: a link with Alzheimer disease. Perceptual and motor skills. 1994. doi:10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.627. PMID: 8022691.

BibTeX

@article{zucco1994-8022691,
  author  = {Zucco, G. M. and Negrin, N. S.},
  title   = {{Olfactory deficits in Down subjects: a link with Alzheimer disease}},
  journal = {Perceptual and motor skills},
  year    = {1994},
  doi     = {10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.627},
  pmid    = {8022691},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.627}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Adults with Down syndrome scored worse than younger people with Down syndrome on two olfactory tasks, and the authors suggest these tasks could be a useful noninvasive diagnostic method. This is about diagnosis and does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 33/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 32 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 33 of 100. Total 33 of 100.32 of the 96 points we could judge = 33 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 32 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 33 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Perceptual and motor skills)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Perceptual and Motor Skills: journal h-index 139 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1994 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 1 / 4 14 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 27 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.8 citations a year over 34 year(s) since 1994
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Nila Saviolo Negrin holds only 3 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Padua: institution h-index 1,158 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 8022691)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 32 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 32 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 33 out of 100.
Total 33 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Also tagged “down”

527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

See all studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's →