Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Hyperphosphorylation of tau leading to neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) is one of the key pathological hallmarks in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer disease (AD). Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (Pin1) regulates the phosphorylation of Ser/Thr sites of tau protein, and promotes microtubule assembly. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of tau hyperphosphorylation on Pin1 expression in primary cortical neurons in order to investigate the results of the pathological process on Pin1, an important enzyme involved in various cellular mechanisms. Primary cortical neurons were prepared from embryonic day 16 -Sprague Dawley rat embryos. The cultures were treated with 25 nM okadaic acid (OKA) on day 7 in order to promote tau hyperphosphorylation. The cytotoxicity was determined with LDH release and measured by ELISA. Tau phosphorylation was confirmed by western blot using anti-tau antibodies Thr231 and Tau-1. Pin1 mRNA expression level was determined by qRT-PCR at 8 and 24 h. Pin1 protein expression was analyzed with immunofluorescent labeling at 8 and 24 h. Tau phosphorylation on Thr231 was increased and non-phosphorylated Tau-1 was decreased in OKA treated group compared with the untreated control at 8 h of treatment. While Pin1 mRNA expression levels at 8 h post-OKA treatment were lower than that of control groups, there were no differences between OKA-treated group and control groups in Pin1 protein expression. Whereas no significant differences for Pin1 mRNA expression, protein expression levels were decreased OKA-treated group compared to control groups at 24 h of treatment. The LDH release of OKA-treated group was significantly increased at 24 h. Our study indicates that although OKA treatment suppressed Pin1 mRNA expression and induced tau phosphorylation at 8 h of treatment, its influence on Pin1 protein expression has 16 h phase delay. Given the important role of Pin1 in many cellular mechanisms these results might indicate that tau hyperphosphorylation involved in many neurodegenerative disorders may cause some alterations in brain microenvironment via Pin1.This is the first demonstration of the alteration of the Pin1 mRNA and protein expression in OKA induced model in primary cortical neurons.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Metin-Armağan, D., Gezen-Ak, D., Dursun, E., İL, A., Karabay, A., Yılmazer, S., et al. (2018). Okadaic acid-induced tau hyperphosphorylation and the downregulation of Pin1 expression in primary cortical neurons. Journal of chemical neuroanatomy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2018.05.006

Vancouver

Metin-Armağan D, Gezen-Ak D, Dursun E, İL A, Karabay A, Yılmazer S, et al. Okadaic acid-induced tau hyperphosphorylation and the downregulation of Pin1 expression in primary cortical neurons. Journal of chemical neuroanatomy. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jchemneu.2018.05.006. PMID: 29860071.

BibTeX

@article{metinarmagan2018-29860071,
  author  = {Metin-Armağan, D. and Gezen-Ak, D. and Dursun, E. and İL, Atasoy and Karabay, A. and Yılmazer, S. and Öztürk, M.},
  title   = {{Okadaic acid-induced tau hyperphosphorylation and the downregulation of Pin1 expression in primary cortical neurons}},
  journal = {Journal of chemical neuroanatomy},
  year    = {2018},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.jchemneu.2018.05.006},
  pmid    = {29860071},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2018.05.006}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 22 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 38 of 100. Total 38 of 100.22 of the 58 points we could judge = 38 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of chemical neuroanatomy)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2018 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 29860071)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 22 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100.
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →