Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease with increasing incidence in aged populations, second only to Alzheimer's disease. Increasing evidence has shown that inflammation plays an important role in the occurrence and development of Parkinson's disease. Growing evidence has shown that AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and NF-κB are closely related to inflammation. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a hormone that is primarily secreted by intestinal endocrine L cells, and it has a variety of physiology through binding to GLP-1 receptor. GLP-1can be used for treatment of type 2 diabetes. In addition, GLP-1 also has anti-neuroinflammation activity. However, the exact mechanism behind how GLP-1 regulates neuroinflammation remains unclear. This study was designed to examine the effect of liraglutide on 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6- tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced injury in mice and its potential mechanism of action. Results showed that liraglutide dose-dependently ameliorated mouse behavior including swimming time and locomotor activity, increased the number of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive neurons and protein level, and reduced Iba1 and GFAP expression in the substantia nigra (SN). Liraglutide treatment also increased p-AMPK expression and reduced NF-κB protein level. Applying the AMPK inhibitor Dorsomorphin (Compound C) reversed the effect of liraglutide-reducing p-AMPK and increasing NF-κB expression. Finally, GFAP protein level increased, along with a decrease in TH expression. In conclusion, these results suggest that liraglutide can suppress neuroinflammation. Moreover, this effect is mediated through the AMPK/NF-κB signaling pathway.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Cao, B., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Wu, P., Dong, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Neuroprotective effects of liraglutide against inflammation through the AMPK/NF-κB pathway in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease. Metabolic brain disease. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-021-00879-1

Vancouver

Cao B, Zhang Y, Chen J, Wu P, Dong Y, Wang Y. Neuroprotective effects of liraglutide against inflammation through the AMPK/NF-κB pathway in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease. Metabolic brain disease. 2022. doi:10.1007/s11011-021-00879-1. PMID: 34817756.

BibTeX

@article{cao2022-34817756,
  author  = {Cao, B. and Zhang, Y. and Chen, J. and Wu, P. and Dong, Y. and Wang, Y.},
  title   = {{Neuroprotective effects of liraglutide against inflammation through the AMPK/NF-κB pathway in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease}},
  journal = {Metabolic brain disease},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.1007/s11011-021-00879-1},
  pmid    = {34817756},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-021-00879-1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 23 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 40 of 100. Total 40 of 100.23 of the 58 points we could judge = 40 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Metabolic brain disease)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “mouse”) — scores zero
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34817756)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 23 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100.
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “inflammation”

6 studies in the library carry the topic tag “inflammation”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 6 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →