Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 67 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background Understanding the neuropathological effects of amyloid β (Aβ)-targeting therapies and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in Alzheimer's disease is critical for optimising treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. Comparing Aβ PET imaging with neuropathological assessments provides context for evaluating the extent of Aβ clearance and interpreting in-vivo biomarkers. We aimed to assess clinicopathological changes and ARIA-related effects in aducanumab-treated versus untreated Alzheimer's disease.

Key findings

Why it matters

This retrospective case-control study compared clinicopathological changes and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in five aducanumab-treated participants versus untreated Alzheimer's disease, using autopsy and Aβ PET imaging. It examines the neuropathological effects of treatment in a very small sample rather than showing a cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 67/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 67 of 100.67 of 100 points earned33 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a large phase 3 trial. Scored zero for sample size and effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (The Lancet. Neurology)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 The Lancet Neurology: journal h-index 457 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A large phase 3 trial (from PubMed type “Clinical Trial, Phase III”)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 29 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 9.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 15.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 3 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 29 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Melissa Erin Murray: h-index 93 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Mayo Clinic: institution h-index 1,606 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41109234)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 67 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Boon, B. D. C., Piura, Y. D., Moloney, C. M., Chalk, J. L., Lincoln, S. J., Rutledge, M. H., et al. (2025). Neuropathological changes and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease treated with aducanumab versus untreated: a retrospective case-control study. The Lancet. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00313-8

Vancouver

Boon BDC, Piura YD, Moloney CM, Chalk JL, Lincoln SJ, Rutledge MH, et al. Neuropathological changes and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease treated with aducanumab versus untreated: a retrospective case-control study. The Lancet. Neurology. 2025. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00313-8. PMID: 41109234.

BibTeX

@article{boon2025-41109234,
  author  = {Boon, B. D. C. and Piura, Y. D. and Moloney, C. M. and Chalk, J. L. and Lincoln, S. J. and Rutledge, M. H. and Rothberg, D. M. and Kouri, N. and others},
  title   = {{Neuropathological changes and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease treated with aducanumab versus untreated: a retrospective case-control study}},
  journal = {The Lancet. Neurology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00313-8},
  pmid    = {41109234},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00313-8}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →