Home › Research › Treatments
Mouse models of Anti-Aβ immunotherapies
Pikus P, Turner RS, Rebeck GW.. Molecular neurodegeneration, 2025-05-13
Topic: Inflammation, microglia and astrocytes
Background The development of anti-amyloid-beta (Aβ) immunotherapies as the first disease modifying therapy for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a breakthrough of basic research and translational science. Main text Genetically modified mouse models developed to study AD neuropathology and physiology were used for the discovery of Aβ immunotherapies and helped ultimately propel therapies to FDA approval. Nonetheless, the combination of modest efficacy and significant rates of an adverse side effect (amyloid related imaging abnormalities, ARIA), has prompted reverse translational research in these same mouse models to better understand the mechanism of the therapies. Conclusion This review considers the use of these mouse models in understanding the mechanisms of Aβ clearance, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), blood brain barrier breakdown, neuroinflammation, and neuronal dysfunction in response to Aβ immunotherapy.
Key findings
- Nonetheless, the combination of modest efficacy and significant rates of an adverse side effect (amyloid related imaging abnormalities, ARIA), has prompted reverse translational research in these same mouse models to better understand the mechanism of the therapies.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 45/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Molecular neurodegeneration) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Laboratory or animal study (title names “mouse”) — scores zero |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40361247) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 26 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100. |
| Total | 45 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Pikus, P., Turner, R. S., & Rebeck, G. W. (2025). Mouse models of Anti-Aβ immunotherapies. Molecular neurodegeneration. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-025-00836-x
Vancouver
Pikus P, Turner RS, Rebeck GW. Mouse models of Anti-Aβ immunotherapies. Molecular neurodegeneration. 2025. doi:10.1186/s13024-025-00836-x. PMID: 40361247.
BibTeX
@article{pikus2025-40361247,
author = {Pikus, P. and Turner, R. S. and Rebeck, G. W.},
title = {{Mouse models of Anti-Aβ immunotherapies}},
journal = {Molecular neurodegeneration},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1186/s13024-025-00836-x},
pmid = {40361247},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-025-00836-x}
}
Related studies in Treatments
Also tagged “aducanumab”
332 studies in the library carry the topic tag “aducanumab”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 332 tagged studies.