Home › Research › Drug development
Molecular Therapeutics in Development to Treat Alzheimer's Disease
Tartaglia MC, Ingelsson M.. Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2024-09-24
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Until recently, only symptomatic therapies, in the form of acetylcholine esterase inhibitors and NMDA-receptor antagonists, have been available for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. However, advancements in our understanding of the amyloid cascade hypothesis have led to a development of disease-modifying therapeutic strategies. These include immunotherapies based on an infusion of monoclonal antibodies against amyloid-β, three of which have been approved for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in the USA (one of them, lecanemab, has also been approved in several other countries). They all lead to a dramatic reduction of amyloid plaques in the brain, whereas their clinical effects have been more limited. Moreover, they can all lead to side effects in the form of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. Ongoing developments aim at facilitating their administration, further improving their effects and reducing the risk for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. Moreover, a number of anti-tau immunotherapies are in clinical trials, but none has so far shown any robust effects on symptoms or pathology. Another line of development is represented by gene therapy. To date, only antisense oligonucleotides against amyloid precursor protein/amyloid-β and tau have reached the clinical trial stage but a variety of gene editing strategies, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9-mediated non-homologous end joining, base editing, and prime editing, have all shown promise on preclinical disease models. In addition, a number of other pharmacological compounds targeting a multitude of biochemical processes, believed to be centrally involved in Alzheimer's disease, are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. This article delves into current and future perspectives on the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, with an emphasis on immunotherapeutic and gene therapeutic strategies.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Tartaglia, M. C., & Ingelsson, M. (2025). Molecular Therapeutics in Development to Treat Alzheimer's Disease. Molecular diagnosis & therapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-024-00738-6
Vancouver
Tartaglia MC, Ingelsson M. Molecular Therapeutics in Development to Treat Alzheimer's Disease. Molecular diagnosis & therapy. 2025. doi:10.1007/s40291-024-00738-6. PMID: 39316339.
BibTeX
@article{tartaglia2025-39316339,
author = {Tartaglia, M. C. and Ingelsson, M.},
title = {{Molecular Therapeutics in Development to Treat Alzheimer's Disease}},
journal = {Molecular diagnosis \& therapy},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1007/s40291-024-00738-6},
pmid = {39316339},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-024-00738-6}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Moreover, a number of anti-tau immunotherapies are in clinical trials, but none has so far shown any robust effects on symptoms or pathology.
- Another line of development is represented by gene therapy.
- To date, only antisense oligonucleotides against amyloid precursor protein/amyloid-β and tau have reached the clinical trial stage but a variety of gene editing strategies, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9-mediated non-homologous end joining, base editing, and prime editing, have all shown promise on preclinical disease models.
- In addition, a number of other pharmacological compounds targeting a multitude of biochemical processes, believed to be centrally involved in Alzheimer's disease, are currently being evaluated in clinical trials.
- This article delves into current and future perspectives on the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, with an emphasis on immunotherapeutic and gene therapeutic strategies.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 45/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Molecular diagnosis & therapy) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39316339) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 26 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100. |
| Total | 45 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.