Home › Research › Biomarkers
Modulation of amyloid precursor protein cleavage by γ-secretase activating protein through phase separation
Chen Jin, Jiaoni Wang, Yumeng Wang, Bojun Jia, Xuefei Guo, Guanghui Yang, Peng Xu, Paul Greengard et al.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022-03-17
Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies
Aberrant cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by γ-secretase is closely associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). γ-secretase activating protein (GSAP) specifically promotes γ-secretase–mediated cleavage of APP. However, the underlying mechanism remains enigmatic. Here, we demonstrate that the 16-kDa C-terminal fragment of GSAP (GSAP-16K) undergoes phase separation in vitro and forms puncta-like condensates in cells. GSAP-16K exerts dual modulation on γ-secretase cleavage; GSAP-16K in dilute phase increases APP–C-terminal 99-residue fragment (C99) cleavage toward preferred production of β-amyloid peptide 42 (Aβ42), but GSAP-16K condensates reduce APP-C99 cleavage through substrate sequestration. Notably, the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio is markedly elevated with increasing concentrations of GSAP-16K. GSAP-16K stably associates with APP-C99 through specific sequence elements. These findings mechanistically explain GSAP-mediated modulation of γ-secretase activity that may have ramifications on the development of potential therapeutics.
Key findings
- Aberrant cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by γ-secretase is closely associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). γ-secretase activating protein (GSAP) specifically promotes γ-secretase–mediated cleavage of APP.
- These findings mechanistically explain GSAP-mediated modulation of γ-secretase activity that may have ramifications on the development of potential therapeutics.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 41/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 35298330) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 23 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100. |
| Total | 41 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Jin, C., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Jia, B., Guo, X., Yang, G., et al. (2022). Modulation of amyloid precursor protein cleavage by γ-secretase activating protein through phase separation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122292119
Vancouver
Jin C, Wang J, Wang Y, Jia B, Guo X, Yang G, et al. Modulation of amyloid precursor protein cleavage by γ-secretase activating protein through phase separation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2022. doi:10.1073/pnas.2122292119. PMID: 35298330.
BibTeX
@article{jin2022-35298330,
author = {Jin, Chen and Wang, Jiaoni and Wang, Yumeng and Jia, Bojun and Guo, Xuefei and Yang, Guanghui and Xu, Peng and Greengard, Paul and others},
title = {{Modulation of amyloid precursor protein cleavage by γ-secretase activating protein through phase separation}},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.2122292119},
pmid = {35298330},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122292119}
}
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also tagged “presenilin”
343 studies in the library carry the topic tag “presenilin”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 343 tagged studies.