Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Disease mechanisms

Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies

Cortical synaptic loss has emerged as an early abnormality in Alzheimer's disease (AD) with a strong relationship to cognitive performance. However, the status of synapses in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) has received meager experimental attention. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in cortical synaptic proteins in FTLD with tar DNA binding protein-43 (TDP-43) proteinopathy. A second aim was to study phagocytosis of synaptic proteins by microglia as a surrogate for synaptic pruning. Western blot analysis in frozen tissue from the middle frontal gyrus revealed decreased levels of the presynaptic protein synaptophysin, but slightly increased levels of the postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) in FTLD-TDP. Levels of the dendritic spine protein spinophilin displayed the largest decrease. Double immunofluorescent staining visualized aggregate or punctate synaptic protein immunoreactivity in microglia. Overall, the proportion of microglia containing synaptic proteins was larger in FTLD-TDP when compared with normal controls. The increase in PSD95 levels may represent reactive upregulation of this protein, as suggested in AD. While greater numbers of microglia containing synaptic proteins is consistent with loss of synapses in FTLD-TDP, it may also be an indication of abnormal synaptic pruning by microglia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Ayala, I., Bahrami, A., Pan, Y., Spencer, C., Flanagan, M. E., Mesulam, M.-M., et al. (2024). Loss and microglia phagocytosis of synaptic proteins in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 proteinopathy. Neurochemistry international. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2024.105719

Vancouver

Ayala I, Bahrami A, Pan Y, Spencer C, Flanagan ME, Mesulam M.-M, et al. Loss and microglia phagocytosis of synaptic proteins in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 proteinopathy. Neurochemistry international. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2024.105719. PMID: 38452814.

BibTeX

@article{ayala2024-38452814,
  author  = {Ayala, Ivan and Bahrami, Atousa and Pan, Yuting and Spencer, Callen and Flanagan, Margaret E and Mesulam, M-Marsel and Gefen, Tamar and Geula, Changiz},
  title   = {{Loss and microglia phagocytosis of synaptic proteins in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 proteinopathy}},
  journal = {Neurochemistry international},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.neuint.2024.105719},
  pmid    = {38452814},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2024.105719}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 24 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 43 of 100. Total 43 of 100.24 of the 56 points we could judge = 43 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multicenter collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neurochemistry international)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38452814)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 24 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100.
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Disease mechanisms

Also tagged “dendritic”

287 studies in the library carry the topic tag “dendritic”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 287 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Disease mechanisms

See all studies in Disease mechanisms →