Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 86 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Key points Lower kidney function is associated with higher concentrations of blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and related dementia. Background Studies have shown that low kidney function may link to elevated Alzheimer's disease and related dementia fluid biomarkers, but the results are not consistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether kidney function was associated with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia biomarkers (amyloid- β , tau, neurofilament light [NfL] protein, and glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]) in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Results Of the 3024 studies screened, 93 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 62,503 participants (mean age, 20-96 years; 54% female) from 21 countries. In meta-analysis of unadjusted correlation coefficients, kidney function (primarily eGFR) was inversely associated with concentrations of blood NfL, GFAP, Aβ40, β-amyloid 1-40 (A β 40), β-amyloid 1-42, and phosphorylated tau (p-tau181). In meta-analysis of adjusted regression coefficients, eGFR remained inversely associated with blood biomarker levels. Specifically, every 1 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 lower eGFR was associated with 0.19 pg/ml higher NfL (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.25), 0.11 pg/ml higher GFAP (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.18), and 0.29 pg/ml higher A β 40 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.56). Conclusions Low kidney function was associated with elevated blood biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (NfL, GFAP, and A β 40), whereas associations with CSF biomarkers were inconsistent and generally null.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Lin, Y., Zhao, Z., Zhu, N., Garcia Ptacek, S., Carrero, J. J., Bruchfeld, A., et al. (2026). Kidney Function and Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000001007

Vancouver

Lin Y, Zhao Z, Zhu N, Garcia Ptacek S, Carrero JJ, Bruchfeld A, et al. Kidney Function and Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2026. doi:10.1681/asn.0000001007. PMID: 41587095.

BibTeX

@article{lin2026-41587095,
  author  = {Lin, Y. and Zhao, Z. and Zhu, N. and Garcia Ptacek, S. and Carrero, J. J. and Bruchfeld, A. and Eriksdotter, M. and Mielke, M. M. and others},
  title   = {{Kidney Function and Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis}},
  journal = {Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1681/asn.0000001007},
  pmid    = {41587095},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000001007}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 86/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 50 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 86 of 100. Total 86 of 100.50 of the 58 points we could judge = 86 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 50 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 86 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 62,503 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41587095)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 50 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 50 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 86 out of 100.
Total 86 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “kidney-function”

3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “kidney-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →