Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Inflammation, microglia and astrocytes

Isogenic BMEC-like cells with different APOE genotypes had similar trans-endothelial electrical resistance, tight junction integrity and efflux transporter gene expression. However, recombinant APOE4 protein significantly impeded the "brain-to-blood" amyloid beta 1-40 (Aβ40) transport capabilities of BMEC-like cells, suggesting a role in diminished amyloid clearance. Conversely, APOE2 increased amyloid beta 1-42 (Aβ42) transport in the model. Furthermore, we demonstrated that APOE-mediated amyloid transport by BMEC-like cells is dependent on LRP1 and p-glycoprotein pathways, mirroring in vivo findings. Pericyte-like cells exhibited similar APOE secretion levels across genotypes, yet APOE4 pericyte-like cells showed heightened extracellular amyloid deposition, while APOE2 pericyte-like cells displayed the least amyloid deposition, an observation in line with vascular pathologies in AD patients. While APOE genotype did not directly impact general BMEC or pericyte properties, APOE4 exacerbated amyloid clearance and deposition at the model BBB. Conversely, APOE2 demonstrated a potentially protective role by increasing amyloid transport and decreasing deposition. Our findings highlight that iPSC-derived BBB models can potentially capture amyloid pathologies at the BBB, motivating further development of such in vitro models in AD modeling and drug development.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Ding, Y., Palecek, S. P., & Shusta, E. V. (2024). iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier modeling reveals APOE isoform-dependent interactions with amyloid beta. Fluids and barriers of the CNS. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-024-00580-2

Vancouver

Ding Y, Palecek SP, Shusta EV. iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier modeling reveals APOE isoform-dependent interactions with amyloid beta. Fluids and barriers of the CNS. 2024. doi:10.1186/s12987-024-00580-2. PMID: 39394110.

BibTeX

@article{ding2024-39394110,
  author  = {Ding, Yunfeng and Palecek, Sean P and Shusta, Eric V},
  title   = {{iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier modeling reveals APOE isoform-dependent interactions with amyloid beta}},
  journal = {Fluids and barriers of the CNS},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1186/s12987-024-00580-2},
  pmid    = {39394110},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-024-00580-2}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 24 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 43 of 100. Total 43 of 100.24 of the 56 points we could judge = 43 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Fluids and barriers of the CNS)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “ipsc”) — scores zero
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39394110)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 24 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100.
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “apoe2”

266 studies in the library carry the topic tag “apoe2”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 266 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →