Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 34 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

In 2017, the United Nations reported that the world's population aged 60 years and over was 962 million people, over twice as many older persons than was reported in 1980. This number is expected to double again by 2050, reaching nearly 2.1 billion older persons. Within this projection, the number of persons aged 80 years or over will increase more than threefold, increasing from 137 million to 425 million (United Nations, 2017). \n \nGrowing old is often accompanied by a higher prevalence of medical conditions which can result in the development of moderate to severe functional and/or cognitive impairments to the extent that long‐term accommodation and care is needed. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2017), across their participating countries, there is on average 46 long‐term care beds per 1000 people aged 65 years and over. \n \nPrevention and management of medical conditions and comorbidities typically requires the use of medicines leading to often complex regimes. Polypharmacy, where four or more different medicines are prescribed, may be the unintended consequence. Polypharmacy can be appropriate and necessary, but inappropriate polypharmacy is common in this population. Underprescription may also be a concern, for example, pain medicines for a person unable to express themselves. Prescribing is further complicated by age‐related changes that influence how drugs move around the body and how this impacts on the therapeutic effects of drugs (Kim & Luck Parish, 2017). \n \nNurses caring for older people in care homes play a vital role in the optimization of medicines. As part of a multidisciplinary team, nurses are in the position to closely assess, monitor, and report the need for medicines and any potential or real adverse outcomes of already prescribed medicines (Halvorsen, Stensland, & Granas, 2011). Nurses need to know about evidence‐based interventions to optimize prescribing and the quality of the evidence given the frailty and vulnerability of older people residing in care homes.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Neville, C. C. (2019). Interventions to optimize prescribing for older people in care homes. International Journal of Nursing Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12763

Vancouver

Neville CC. Interventions to optimize prescribing for older people in care homes. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2019. doi:10.1111/ijn.12763. PMID: 31290242.

BibTeX

@article{neville2019-31290242,
  author  = {Neville, Christine C.},
  title   = {{Interventions to optimize prescribing for older people in care homes}},
  journal = {International Journal of Nursing Practice},
  year    = {2019},
  doi     = {10.1111/ijn.12763},
  pmid    = {31290242},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12763}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review concerns interventions to improve prescribing for older people in care homes, where polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing are common. It does not report results on treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease itself.

Study details

How this study scored 34/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 34 of 100.34 of 100 points earned66 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International Journal of Nursing Practice)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 International Journal of Nursing Practice: journal h-index 91 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2019 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,000 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.8 citations a year over 9 year(s) since 2019
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Christine C. Neville: h-index 23 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 University of Southern Queensland: institution h-index 322 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 31290242)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 34 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “delirium”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “delirium”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →