Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies

Purpose Increased immunoreactivity (IR) of beta-amyloid and the amyloid-associated proteins tau and amyloid precursor protein (APP) in the brain have been linked to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease. However, the expression of these proteins has not been investigated in the normal or diseased human retina. Methods Using immunohistochemical techniques, we examined the distribution and age-related changes of anti-tau-1, anti-tau-2, anti-APP, and anti-beta-amyloid IR in the human retina at various ages (n = 24), in retinitis pigmentosa (RP, n = 6), and in age-related macular degeneration (ARMD, n = 10). Results Tau-1 immunoreactivity was intense in the inner retinal layers and did not change with age or in RP. Eyes with ARMD showed less intense staining but exhibited a similar distribution. Tau-2 IR was faint and did not change with age but was mildly increased in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) of eyes with RP and in the retina of eyes with ARMD. APP IR was most prominent in the ganglion cell and nerve fiber layer, and it appeared to increase in ganglion cells of older persons and in RPE cells of eyes with RP and ARMD. Beta-amyloid IR was only detected focally in sub-RPE deposits in eyes from older persons. Conclusions The proteins investigated in this study are present in the human retina. The staining pattern of tau is different from the brain, but it shows no age-related changes. The increased immunoreactivity of APP in retinal ganglion cells of older eyes and in RPE cells of eyes with RP and ARMD, as well as the patchy staining of beta-amyloid within sub-RPE deposits, might indicate a relationship of these proteins to retinal aging and possibly to retinal degeneration in RP.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 25 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 43 of 100. Total 43 of 100.25 of the 58 points we could judge = 43 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Investigative ophthalmology & visual science)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1995 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 1 / 4 24 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 7822152)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 25 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100.
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no DOI, so the citation leaves it out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Löffler, K. U., Edward, D. P., & Tso, M. O. (1995). Immunoreactivity against tau, amyloid precursor protein, and beta-amyloid in the human retina. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

Vancouver

Löffler KU, Edward DP, Tso MO. Immunoreactivity against tau, amyloid precursor protein, and beta-amyloid in the human retina. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 1995. PMID: 7822152.

BibTeX

@article{loffler1995-7822152,
  author  = {Löffler, K. U. and Edward, D. P. and Tso, M. O.},
  title   = {{Immunoreactivity against tau, amyloid precursor protein, and beta-amyloid in the human retina}},
  journal = {Investigative ophthalmology \& visual science},
  year    = {1995},
  pmid    = {7822152}
}

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “phosphorylation”

387 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylation”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 387 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →