Home › Research › Drug development
Hydrated autoclave pretreatment enhances tau immunoreactivity in formalin-fixed normal and Alzheimer's disease brain tissues
Shin RW, Iwaki T, Kitamoto T, Tateishi J.. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 1991-05-01
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
We developed a new immunohistochemical method by which normal tau antigenicity can be visualized in paraffin sections of formalin-fixed brain tissue. This method consists of autoclave pretreatment of sections immersed into distilled water (hydrated autoclaving) before incubation with anti-tau antibodies. In normal human brain, immunoreactive tau was detected in neuronal cell bodies and dendrites, axon fibers, astroglia, oligodendroglia and gray matter neuropil. In previous studies on normal tau distribution, different optimized fixations that effectively preserve tau antigenicity were used but none of these revealed all of these compartments together. Our method is therefore considered to be more sensitive for detecting normal tau immunoreactivity. In addition, hydrated autoclaving had an enhancing effect on the abnormally phosphorylated (modified) tau immunoreactivity in formalin-fixed brains. In hydrated autoclaving of sections from patients with Alzheimer's disease, neuropil threads, senile plaques, extracellular and intracellular tangles were enhanced in quantity and in staining intensity. Therefore, modified tau appears to accumulate more densely than expected from conventional immunohistochemistry. Immunoblot analysis showed that normal or modified tau immunoreactivity was totally or partially eliminated on formalin treatment and could be revisualized by hydrated autoclaving, an event presumably related to recovering of formalin-masked tau antigens through denaturation by hydrated autoclaving.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Shin, R. W., Iwaki, T., Kitamoto, T., & Tateishi, J. (1991). Hydrated autoclave pretreatment enhances tau immunoreactivity in formalin-fixed normal and Alzheimer's disease brain tissues. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.
Vancouver
Shin RW, Iwaki T, Kitamoto T, Tateishi J. Hydrated autoclave pretreatment enhances tau immunoreactivity in formalin-fixed normal and Alzheimer's disease brain tissues. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology. 1991. PMID: 1903170.
BibTeX
@article{shin1991-1903170,
author = {Shin, R. W. and Iwaki, T. and Kitamoto, T. and Tateishi, J.},
title = {{Hydrated autoclave pretreatment enhances tau immunoreactivity in formalin-fixed normal and Alzheimer's disease brain tissues}},
journal = {Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology},
year = {1991},
pmid = {1903170}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no DOI, so the citation leaves it out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- In previous studies on normal tau distribution, different optimized fixations that effectively preserve tau antigenicity were used but none of these revealed all of these compartments together.
- Immunoblot analysis showed that normal or modified tau immunoreactivity was totally or partially eliminated on formalin treatment and could be revisualized by hydrated autoclaving, an event presumably related to recovering of formalin-masked tau antigens through denaturation by hydrated autoclaving.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1991 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 1903170) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “tauopathies”
387 studies in the library carry the topic tag “tauopathies”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 387 tagged studies.