Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment

Background Pathological high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), widely researched in epilepsy, are increasingly being investigated as potential biomarkers of network hyperexcitability in neurodegenerative disorders. This interest is driven by growing evidence of comorbidity between epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), suggesting that these HFOs could be useful biomarkers in these disorders. Patients with AD and mouse models of AD exhibit elevated HFOs during neurophysiology recordings, but whether HFOs occur in DLB remains unknown. Methods To address this question, we quantified cortical HFOs within the spectral range of 250–500 Hz and interictal spikes using surface electroencephalography recordings in a transgenic model of α-synucleinopathy that exhibits features of DLB (A53T mice) and a model of channelopathy-induced epilepsy ( Kcna1 -/- mice) . Results Both A53T and Kcna1 -/- mice exhibited significantly more HFOs than their respective control mice across all vigilance states. A53T mice exhibited more HFOs and interictal spikes than Kcna1 -/- mice, and the HFOs in A53T mice had higher frequencies and longer durations than those in Kcna1 -/- mice. Additionally, HFOs were most prevalent during non-REM sleep in A53T mice, coinciding with the vigilance state in which interictal spikes were most frequent in this model. However, they did not consistently co-occur with interictal spikes or seizures, and HFO counts did not correlate with interictal spike counts during 10-minute recording epochs. Conclusions Our findings indicate that HFOs likely arise from different neuronal populations and are generated through distinct mechanisms in these two models. Importantly, this work shows that HFOs are an electroencephalographic abnormality in a model of DLB and supports their potential as a new biomarker for neurodegenerative disorders.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 13 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 21 of 100. Raw total 21 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 21 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Research Square)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 13 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100.
Total 21 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Vaknalli, R. N., Addo-Osafo, K., C, V. S. M., Hwang, K., Vicente, M., Bragin, A., et al. (2026). High-frequency oscillations arise through distinct mechanisms in models of α- synucleinopathy and channelopathy-induced epilepsy. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10385398/v1

Vancouver

Vaknalli RN, Addo-Osafo K, C VSM, Hwang K, Vicente M, Bragin A, et al. High-frequency oscillations arise through distinct mechanisms in models of α- synucleinopathy and channelopathy-induced epilepsy. Research Square. 2026. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10385398/v1.

BibTeX

@article{vaknalli2026-370e6321,
  author  = {Vaknalli, R. N. and Addo-Osafo, K. and C, V. S. M. and Hwang, K. and Vicente, M. and Bragin, A. and Vossel, K.},
  title   = {{High-frequency oscillations arise through distinct mechanisms in models of α- synucleinopathy and channelopathy-induced epilepsy}},
  journal = {Research Square},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-10385398/v1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10385398/v1}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Also in Risk factors

356 studies in the library are filed under Risk factors with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Risk factors hub.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →