Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies

The global north is facing an unprecedented rise in the prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases. The increasing incidence of Parkinson's disease is being referred to as a pandemic. The reason for the enormous increase is only partly understood. Lifestyle factors are known to play a role, but they alone cannot account for the surge. One factor that-although being recognized as important-has not been explored in detail so far is the influence of circadian rhythms. Sleep and circadian rhythm disruption are known as key factors in neurodegeneration, and their occurrence during early disease stages suggests a causal role in the pathogenesis. Isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) has been identified as a prodromal state of α-synucleinopathies, such as Parkinson's disease, Lewy body dementia, and multiple system atrophy offering a window for insights into the early development of these diseases. Even though REM sleep is the sleep state most pronounced, driven and modulated by the circadian timing system, specific circadian abnormalities have not been described in iRBD. Novel experimental and clinical approaches exploiting the molecular circuitry underlying circadian timekeeping hold promise to disentangle some of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of α-synucleinopathies. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on sleep and circadian rhythm disruptions in α-synucleinopathies with an emphasis on molecular aspects and therapeutic potentials. These insights might contribute to our understanding of the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases and may allow therapeutic interventions addressing the disturbed circadian system at the early stage of disease.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kunz, D., Oster, H., Rawashdeh, O., Neumann, W.-J., Münte, T., & Berg, D. (2023). Sleep and circadian rhythms in α-synucleinopathies-Perspectives for disease modification. Acta physiologica (Oxford, England). https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13966

Vancouver

Kunz D, Oster H, Rawashdeh O, Neumann W.-J, Münte T, Berg D. Sleep and circadian rhythms in α-synucleinopathies-Perspectives for disease modification. Acta physiologica (Oxford, England). 2023. doi:10.1111/apha.13966. PMID: 36951649.

BibTeX

@article{kunz2023-36951649,
  author  = {Kunz, Dieter and Oster, Henrik and Rawashdeh, Oliver and Neumann, Wolf-Julian and Münte, Thomas and Berg, Daniela},
  title   = {{Sleep and circadian rhythms in α-synucleinopathies-Perspectives for disease modification}},
  journal = {Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1111/apha.13966},
  pmid    = {36951649},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13966}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 23 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 41 of 100. Total 41 of 100.23 of the 56 points we could judge = 41 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Acta physiologica (Oxford, England))
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 36951649)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 23 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100.
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “apnea”

196 studies in the library carry the topic tag “apnea”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 196 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →