Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 29 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Despite having an increased risk of developing dementia, individuals from minority ethnic communities are largely overlooked by research and dementia services and are less likely to receive timely diagnosis and appropriate support. Culturally specific programmes and policies that promote awareness and engage with minority ethnic communities around brain health and dementia are urgently needed to prevent, diagnose and support people living with dementia. In response to these challenges, we developed and evaluated the Healthy Brain Healthy Life project, a targeted culturally tailored dementia-prevention public engagement project to create dialogue and engage with minority ethnic communities around brain health and dementia. The project involved a series of co-produced, culturally tailored interactive workshops with minority ethnic communities and community organisations in the UK. Outputs, which remain an available resource, included: (a) co-produced culturally tailored information booklet; (b) a recipe book, including six recipes and information on ingredients that support brain health; and (c) digital stories from each workshop, sharing the experiences of participants and highlighting key messages on brain health. This article is a practice case study that describes the co-production process, implementation and evaluation of the workshops. The project achieved national and international impact, creating dialogue around dementia in the workshops, the local community and on social media. Here, we share the learnings from our approach as an example of best-practice in engaging minority ethnic communities to develop knowledge and understanding of this stigmatised condition to inform future research. Our lessons demonstrate the value and impact of co-production and participatory methods embedded in cultural competency to create community discussion around public health agendas and messages.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Amenyah, S., Heward, M., Bradley, L., Tse, D., & Bate, L. (2025). Healthy Brain Healthy Life: an innovative and culturally tailored approach to dementia prevention in minority ethnic communities. Research for All. https://doi.org/10.14324/rfa.09.1.14

Vancouver

Amenyah S, Heward M, Bradley L, Tse D, Bate L. Healthy Brain Healthy Life: an innovative and culturally tailored approach to dementia prevention in minority ethnic communities. Research for All. 2025. doi:10.14324/rfa.09.1.14.

BibTeX

@article{amenyah2025-e4601d63,
  author  = {Amenyah, Sophia and Heward, Michelle and Bradley, Lyndsey and Tse, Dorothy and Bate, Louise},
  title   = {{Healthy Brain Healthy Life: an innovative and culturally tailored approach to dementia prevention in minority ethnic communities}},
  journal = {Research for All},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.14324/rfa.09.1.14},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.14324/rfa.09.1.14}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This project developed culturally tailored workshops and resources to engage minority ethnic communities in the UK around brain health and dementia. It is a practice case study describing the co-production process and evaluation, not a test of whether the approach reduces dementia risk.

Study details

How this study scored 29/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 28 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 29 of 100. Total 29 of 100.28 of the 96 points we could judge = 29 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 28 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 29 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Research for All)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Research for All: journal h-index 18 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Louise Bate holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Northumbria University: institution h-index 354 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 28 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 28 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 29 out of 100.
Total 29 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Disparities

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,223 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,223 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →