Home › Research › Drug development
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor stimulation as a means of neuroprotection
Harkavyi A, Whitton PS.. British journal of pharmacology, 2010-01-29
Topic: Gut, metabolism and diet
Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a relatively recently discovered molecule originating in the so-called L-cells of the intestine. The peptide has insulinotrophic properties and it is this characteristic that has predominantly been investigated. This has led to the use of the GLP-1-like peptide exendin-4 (EX-4), which has a much longer plasma half-life than GLP-1 itself, being used in the treatment of type II diabetes. The mode of action of this effect appears to be a reduction in pancreatic apoptosis, an increase in beta cell proliferation or both. Thus, the effects of GLP-1 receptor stimulation are not based upon insulin replacement but an apparent repair of the pancreas. Similar data suggest that the same effects may occur in other peripheral tissues. More recently, the roles of GLP-1 and EX-4 have been studied in nervous tissue. As in the periphery, both peptides appear to promote cellular growth and reduce apoptosis. In models of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and peripheral neuropathy, stimulation of the GLP-1 receptor has proved to be highly beneficial. In the case of Parkinson's disease this effect is evident after the neurotoxic lesion is established, suggesting real potential for therapeutic use. In the present review we examine the current status of the GLP-1 receptor and its potential as a therapeutic target.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Harkavyi, A., & Whitton, P. S. (2010). Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor stimulation as a means of neuroprotection. British journal of pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00486.x
Vancouver
Harkavyi A, Whitton PS. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor stimulation as a means of neuroprotection. British journal of pharmacology. 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00486.x. PMID: 20128800.
BibTeX
@article{harkavyi2010-20128800,
author = {Harkavyi, A. and Whitton, P. S.},
title = {{Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor stimulation as a means of neuroprotection}},
journal = {British journal of pharmacology},
year = {2010},
doi = {10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00486.x},
pmid = {20128800},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00486.x}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Similar data suggest that the same effects may occur in other peripheral tissues.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (British journal of pharmacology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2010 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 20128800) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Drug development from nearby years
Also tagged “peptide-1”
285 studies in the library carry the topic tag “peptide-1”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 285 tagged studies.