Home › Research › Drug development
GLP-1 receptor agonists downregulate aberrant GnT-III expression in Alzheimer's disease models through the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling
Wang Y, Chen S, Xu Z, Chen S, Yao W, Gao X.. Neuropharmacology, 2017-12-07
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Alterations of glycoprotein glycans contribute to a wide variety of diseases. Bisecting N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) levels increased in the cerebrospinal fluid of most Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and the mRNA levels of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III), a glycosyltransferase responsible for synthesizing a bisecting GlcNAc residue, were found highly expressed in the brains of AD patients. In our previous studies, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and its mimetics showed neuroprotective effects. Here, we confirmed that four weeks' treatment of exendin-4 could rescue memory deficits and neuropathological changes in APP/PS1 mice. We further explored the underlying mechanism and especially the role of GnT-III in it. We demonstrated for the first time that the levels of GnT-III and bisecting GlcNAc were increased in APP/PS1 mice and Aβ 25-35 -treated PC12 cells, and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) could downregulate aberrant neuronal expression of GnT-III and bisecting GlcNAc. We also found that GLP-1RA recovered the phosphorylation levels of Akt (Ser473) and GSK-3β (Ser9) and the levels of β-catenin in mice and cell models. Furthermore, the results indicated that inhibitor LY294002 attenuated these effects of GLP-1RA in PC12 cells, and β-catenin siRNA abolished the effect of GLP-1RA on GnT-III. In summary, our results suggest that GnT-III plays an important role in AD and GLP-1RA could downregulate aberrant GnT-III expression through the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway in neurons.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Wang, Y., Chen, S., Xu, Z., Yao, W., & Gao, X. (2018). GLP-1 receptor agonists downregulate aberrant GnT-III expression in Alzheimer's disease models through the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling. Neuropharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.11.048
Vancouver
Wang Y, Chen S, Xu Z, Yao W, Gao X. GLP-1 receptor agonists downregulate aberrant GnT-III expression in Alzheimer's disease models through the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling. Neuropharmacology. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.11.048. PMID: 29223528.
BibTeX
@article{wang2018-29223528,
author = {Wang, Y. and Chen, S. and Xu, Z. and Yao, W. and Gao, X.},
title = {{GLP-1 receptor agonists downregulate aberrant GnT-III expression in Alzheimer's disease models through the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling}},
journal = {Neuropharmacology},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.11.048},
pmid = {29223528},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.11.048}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- We demonstrated for the first time that the levels of GnT-III and bisecting GlcNAc were increased in APP/PS1 mice and Aβ 25-35 -treated PC12 cells, and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) could downregulate aberrant neuronal expression of GnT-III and bisecting GlcNAc.
- Furthermore, the results indicated that inhibitor LY294002 attenuated these effects of GLP-1RA in PC12 cells, and β-catenin siRNA abolished the effect of GLP-1RA on GnT-III.
- In summary, our results suggest that GnT-III plays an important role in AD and GLP-1RA could downregulate aberrant GnT-III expression through the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway in neurons.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 38/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuropharmacology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2018 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 29223528) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 22 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100. |
| Total | 38 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “akt-gsk-3”
3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “akt-gsk-3”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.