Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers

Plain-language summary

Clinical and neuropsychological studies of chronically institutionalized patients with schizophrenia indicate that severe cognitive impairment and functional disability in late life are very prevalent. The biological substrates for this dementia remain unknown. While subtle cytoarchitectural and morphometric abnormalities have been described in patients with schizophrenia and interpreted as reflecting aberrant neurodevelopment, postmaturational injury or neurodegeneration associated with gliosis remain as plausible explanations of at least some of the clinical manifestations of schizophrenia. We monitored astrocytosis and neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) formation in 21 elderly patients with schizophrenia (14 with concurrent dementia, 7 without), and in 12 normal and 5 Alzheimer's disease (AD) control cases. Astrocytes in ventromedial temporal, frontal, and calcarine cortices were immunohistochemically identified with monoclonal antibodies directed at glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin, and NFTs were labeled with an anti-tau antibody specific for paired helical filaments. There were no increases in GFAP- or vimentin-immunoreactive astrocyte counts, GFAP optical density, or NFT counts for the schizophrenic group as a whole compared to the non-neuropsychiatric group, while both groups differed from AD. When patients with schizophrenia were divided into demented and non-demented subtypes, those with dementia demonstrated significantly greater numbers of GFAP-positive astrocytes than those without dementia. These data may reflect an up-regulation of GFAP in normal astrocytes or the presence of reactive astrocytosis in a subgroup of schizophrenics. In the absence of any diagnostic neuropathological findings in this subgroup, the implications of these observations for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia remain to be determined.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Arnold, S. E., Franz, B. R., Trojanowski, J. Q., Moberg, P. J., & Gur, R. E. (1996). Glial fibrillary acidic protein-immunoreactive astrocytosis in elderly patients with schizophrenia and dementia. Acta neuropathologica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004010050425

Vancouver

Arnold SE, Franz BR, Trojanowski JQ, Moberg PJ, Gur RE. Glial fibrillary acidic protein-immunoreactive astrocytosis in elderly patients with schizophrenia and dementia. Acta neuropathologica. 1996. doi:10.1007/s004010050425. PMID: 8834539.

BibTeX

@article{arnold1996-8834539,
  author  = {Arnold, S. E. and Franz, B. R. and Trojanowski, J. Q. and Moberg, P. J. and Gur, R. E.},
  title   = {{Glial fibrillary acidic protein-immunoreactive astrocytosis in elderly patients with schizophrenia and dementia}},
  journal = {Acta neuropathologica},
  year    = {1996},
  doi     = {10.1007/s004010050425},
  pmid    = {8834539},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s004010050425}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 23 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 40 of 100. Total 40 of 100.23 of the 58 points we could judge = 40 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Acta neuropathologica)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1996 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 8834539)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 23 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100.
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development from nearby years

Also in Drug development

106 studies in the library are filed under Drug development with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Drug development hub.

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →