Home › Research › Drug development
Future Directions in Choline: From Neurodevelopment to Cardiometabolic Health
Paules EM, Petry HG, Sprinkles JK, Trujillo-Gonzalez I.. Nutrients, 2025-11-20
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Although choline was established as an essential nutrient over three decades ago, critical questions remain about how choline regulates brain, liver, and cardiometabolic health across the lifespan. This Perspective summarizes emerging insights presented at the Future Directions in Choline Symposium: A Tribute to Steven H. Zeisel , which outlined three converging areas of research: (i) choline-dependent mechanisms in neurodevelopment and cognition, (ii) the link between choline metabolism and obesity, and (iii) the role of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) in cardiovascular disease. Evidence from clinical and preclinical studies confirms that maternal choline intake is critical for neurogenesis, cognition, and visual system development, and that higher choline availability buffers the fetal brain against environmental and psychosocial stressors. Choline supplementation improves cognitive outcomes in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and mitigates neurodegenerative pathology in Alzheimer's models. In cardiometabolic health, recent data challenge the interpretation of TMAO as a causal toxin, positioning it instead as a marker of renal function. Moving forward, the field must develop validated biomarkers of choline adequacy in free-living populations, harmonize intervention protocols, and define context-specific requirements across obesity, pregnancy, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapy use. These efforts will refine dietary recommendations and solidify choline's role in lifelong brain and metabolic health.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Paules, E. M., Petry, H. G., Sprinkles, J. K., & Trujillo-Gonzalez, I. (2025). Future Directions in Choline: From Neurodevelopment to Cardiometabolic Health. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223618
Vancouver
Paules EM, Petry HG, Sprinkles JK, Trujillo-Gonzalez I. Future Directions in Choline: From Neurodevelopment to Cardiometabolic Health. Nutrients. 2025. doi:10.3390/nu17223618. PMID: 41305668.
BibTeX
@article{paules2025-41305668,
author = {Paules, E. M. and Petry, H. G. and Sprinkles, J. K. and Trujillo-Gonzalez, I.},
title = {{Future Directions in Choline: From Neurodevelopment to Cardiometabolic Health}},
journal = {Nutrients},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.3390/nu17223618},
pmid = {41305668},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223618}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Evidence from clinical and preclinical studies confirms that maternal choline intake is critical for neurogenesis, cognition, and visual system development, and that higher choline availability buffers the fetal brain against environmental and psychosocial stressors.
- Choline supplementation improves cognitive outcomes in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and mitigates neurodegenerative pathology in Alzheimer's models.
- In cardiometabolic health, recent data challenge the interpretation of TMAO as a causal toxin, positioning it instead as a marker of renal function.
- Moving forward, the field must develop validated biomarkers of choline adequacy in free-living populations, harmonize intervention protocols, and define context-specific requirements across obesity, pregnancy, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapy use.
- These efforts will refine dietary recommendations and solidify choline's role in lifelong brain and metabolic health.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 45/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Nutrients) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41305668) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 26 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100. |
| Total | 45 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “health”
4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “health”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.