Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

The use of statistical physics models to investigate real-world networks and reveal their underlying dynamics has shown promising results and acquired increasing attention. Here, we show how exponential random-graph (ERG) models can be suitably adopted to characterize how Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects brain connectivity. Magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was used to define a brain connectivity network whose nodes are the different brain regions, and the links indicate the pairwise structural relationships. Based on T1-weighted MRI brain scans of 126 normal controls (NC) and 92 AD patients, ERGs were able to outline both "global" and "local" disease patterns. Our findings demonstrate that ERGs accurately highlight how AD affects brain connectivity reaching an overall classification accuracy of 0.82±0.08. Besides, ERGs outline which regions of the brain are the most affected by the disease, thus proving to be a formidable instrument also to investigate the disease pathological mechanisms; more importantly, as these effects are evaluated at patient level, they can be exploited to design innovative diagnosis support systems or to provide a novel explainable framework for decision support systems. Finally, thanks to its generality, the approach proposed in this study paves the way for further applications and investigations inquiring into the use of ERGs for other diseases and different data sources or the use of alternative models.

Key findings

Why it matters

Using T1-weighted MRI scans from 126 normal controls and 92 Alzheimer's patients, this study applied exponential random graph models to brain connectivity networks and reached an overall classification accuracy of 0.82±0.08. The authors say the approach could support diagnosis and help investigate disease mechanisms, but it is a diagnostic and explanatory tool, not a treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 32/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 32 of 100.32 of 100 points earned68 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Physical review. E)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Physical review. E: journal h-index 118 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author R. Bellotti: h-index 68 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari: institution h-index 643 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41715836)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 32 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Amoroso, N., Pantaleo, E., La Rocca, M., Bellantuono, L., Pascazio, S., Tangaro, S., et al. (2026). Exponential random graph-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence for Alzheimer disease. Physical review. E. https://doi.org/10.1103/dkn2-9b2t

Vancouver

Amoroso N, Pantaleo E, La Rocca M, Bellantuono L, Pascazio S, Tangaro S, et al. Exponential random graph-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence for Alzheimer disease. Physical review. E. 2026. doi:10.1103/dkn2-9b2t. PMID: 41715836.

BibTeX

@article{amoroso2026-41715836,
  author  = {Amoroso, Nicola and Pantaleo, Ester and La Rocca, Marianna and Bellantuono, Loredana and Pascazio, Saverio and Tangaro, Sabina and Monaco, Alfonso and Bellotti, R.},
  title   = {{Exponential random graph-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence for Alzheimer disease}},
  journal = {Physical review. E},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1103/dkn2-9b2t},
  pmid    = {41715836},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1103/dkn2-9b2t}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →