Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative condition that affects the elderly population. The early detection and diagnosis of AD is critical for achieving effective treatment, as it can greatly improve the patient experience. AD can be viewed through imaging techniques like MRI, PET, and SPECT, providing valuable information about structural and functional changes. These findings are important in understanding this area. However, each imaging modality offers a different perspective. This information can be better collected from several of the other modalities as well as from some others to improve accuracy and reliability in AD detection. By combining information from different imaging modalities, such as MRI, PET, DTI, and fMRI, automated multimodal medical image frameworks aim to create a fused representation that preserves the relevant features from each modality. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs), among other deep learning techniques, have been prevalent in these frameworks for learning discriminative and informative features from multi-modal data. In this paper, The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is used for experimental analysis. The proposed work gives 98.94% of accuracy and 1.06% of error which is greater than the existing approaches.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study combined different types of brain scans using deep learning to detect Alzheimer's disease, reporting 98.94% accuracy. It is a detection method only and does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 31/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 30 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 31 of 100. Total 31 of 100.30 of the 96 points we could judge = 31 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 30 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 31 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing: journal h-index 12 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author I Dhivviyanandam holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Vellore Institute of Technology University: institution h-index 351 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 30 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 30 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 31 out of 100.
Total 31 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Beatrice, S., Janaki Meena, M., & Dhivviyanandam, I. (2025). An automated multimodal medical image fusion framework for Alzheimer detection using deep learning. Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing. https://doi.org/10.61091/jcmcc126-04

Vancouver

Beatrice S, Janaki Meena M, Dhivviyanandam I. An automated multimodal medical image fusion framework for Alzheimer detection using deep learning. Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing. 2025. doi:10.61091/jcmcc126-04.

BibTeX

@article{beatrice2025-f2cfdadd,
  author  = {Beatrice, S. and Janaki Meena, M. and Dhivviyanandam, I},
  title   = {{An automated multimodal medical image fusion framework for Alzheimer detection using deep learning}},
  journal = {Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.61091/jcmcc126-04},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.61091/jcmcc126-04}
}

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →