Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The implementation of needs assessments was associated with increased long-term care (LTC) service utilization. The proportion of caregivers using services rose from 37.3% at baseline to 45.5% after six months. The caregiver burden distribution shifted, with a reduction in moderate to severe burden (from 20.4 to 17.8%) and a slight increase in mild to moderate burden (from 43.7 to 47.2%). Linear regression analysis revealed several key factors influencing caregiver burden. Supportive resources were significantly associated with lower Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) scores, an effect that often strengthened over time. Specifically, enhanced self-care abilities and the involvement of a foreign caregiver significantly reduced burden at both Time 1 (B = -4.79 and B = -5.44, respectively) and Time 2(B = -6.63 and B = -6.78, respectively). The positive impact of shared caregiving responsibilities became statistically significant at Time 2 mark (B = -5.86). Conversely, initial stressors were linked to higher burden. Caregiving for individuals with severe disabilities (B = 3.31) and the need to manage barrier-free environments (B = 5.06) were associated with greater burden at Time 1, though their influence diminished over time. Emotional strain was a strong predictor of increased burden at both time points (B = 3.51 at Time 1; B = 2.93 at Time 2), although its impact also lessened. Finally, older caregiver age was correlated with a lower burden at both time points. The findings highlight the effectiveness of needs assessments in reducing caregiver burden and enhancing service utilization. Needs assessments play a critical role in identifying caregiver stressors and facilitating targeted interventions, essential for sustainable long-term care and caregiver well-being.

Key findings

Why it matters

This cohort study found that implementing needs assessments was associated with increased long-term care service use and a shift in caregiver burden, with supportive resources such as self-care abilities and shared caregiving linked to lower burden. It suggests needs assessments may help connect caregivers to services, but it is an observational study and cannot prove cause and effect.

Study details

How this study scored 48/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 48 of 100.48 of 100 points earned52 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC Nursing)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 BMC Nursing: journal h-index 100 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 6 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Chun‐Min Chen: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Tamkang University: institution h-index 245 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40751254)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 48 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Su, Y., Wang, W.-F., Jhang, K.-M., Mau, L., & Chen, C. (2025). Enhancing care service utilization and reducing burden: the role of needs assessments for dementia caregivers in long-term care. BMC Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03686-6

Vancouver

Su Y, Wang W.-F, Jhang K.-M, Mau L, Chen C. Enhancing care service utilization and reducing burden: the role of needs assessments for dementia caregivers in long-term care. BMC Nursing. 2025. doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03686-6. PMID: 40751254.

BibTeX

@article{su2025-40751254,
  author  = {Su, Yung‐Yu and Wang, Wen-Fu and Jhang, Kai-Ming and Mau, Lih‐Wen and Chen, Chun‐Min},
  title   = {{Enhancing care service utilization and reducing burden: the role of needs assessments for dementia caregivers in long-term care}},
  journal = {BMC Nursing},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1186/s12912-025-03686-6},
  pmid    = {40751254},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03686-6}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Caregiving

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →