Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Hippocampus size on brain scans

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Intractable epilepsy is related to various transient and chronic brain electric and neurochemical disturbances. There is increasing evidence that long-lasting chronic epilepsy may induce secondary neuronal loss and metabolic dysfunctions. Still a matter of controversy is, however, whether cognitive abilities of patients deteriorate with increasing duration of intractable epilepsy. We present results from two independent cross-sectional studies dealing with measures of global cognitive performance in two different ways. The first study investigated in 78 patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) the influence of duration of epilepsy on the difference between an estimated measure of former or pre-morbid intelligence and the current performance in an intelligence test. The second study aimed at duration of epilepsy-dependent effects on current IQ measures of 209 patients with refractory TLE. Both studies showed that the duration of epilepsy contributes to the explanation of interindividual variability in IQ measures of adult TLE patients to a higher degree than age and age of epilepsy onset. Similar to several studies on hippocampal neuronal density, hippocampal volume, and glucose metabolism, the presented cross-sectional data demonstrate that a duration of chronic epilepsy exceeding two decades is associated with worse cognitive abilities. Consequently, refractory TLE seems to induce a very slow but ongoing cognitive deterioration. It is assumed that epilepsy-related noxious events and agents exhaust the compensatory capacity of brain functions. A high cognitive reserve capacity, however, might delay the onset of deterioration.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Jokeit, H., & Ebner, A. (2002). Effects of chronic epilepsy on intellectual functions. Progress in brain research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(02)35042-8

Vancouver

Jokeit H, Ebner A. Effects of chronic epilepsy on intellectual functions. Progress in brain research. 2002. doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(02)35042-8. PMID: 12143364.

BibTeX

@article{jokeit2002-12143364,
  author  = {Jokeit, H. and Ebner, A.},
  title   = {{Effects of chronic epilepsy on intellectual functions}},
  journal = {Progress in brain research},
  year    = {2002},
  doi     = {10.1016/s0079-6123(02)35042-8},
  pmid    = {12143364},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(02)35042-8}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 50/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 29 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 50 of 100. Total 50 of 100.29 of the 58 points we could judge = 50 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 29 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 50 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Progress in brain research)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2002 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 1 / 4 78 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12143364)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 29 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 29 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 50 out of 100.
Total 50 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Hippocampus size on brain scans

Also tagged “disorder”

492 studies in the library carry the topic tag “disorder”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 492 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Hippocampus size on brain scans

See all studies in Hippocampus size on brain scans →