Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 52 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

=0.03), indicating improved executive function. No significant differences were found in attention or memory domains. Also, the HCT group exhibited improvements in psychological profiles. A home-based HCT program improved frontal executive function in CU older adults. The hybrid analog-digital design may help reduce digital barriers, support usability, and foster sustained participation. Larger trials with active controls, modality-specific comparators, and extended follow-up are warranted to confirm benefits and optimize delivery. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007922.

Key findings

Why it matters

This pilot randomized controlled trial found that a home-based hybrid cognitive training programme improved frontal executive function, with no significant differences in attention or memory. It suggests possible benefit for executive function, but it does not show that the training treats, cures or prevents Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 52/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 52 of 100.52 of 100 points earned48 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders: journal h-index 25 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 33 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 2 / 2 Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Geon Ha Kim: h-index 36 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Ewha Womans University: institution h-index 490 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41220868)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 52 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Chung, S. S., Kim, B. R., Moon, S., & Kim, G. H. (2025). Effects of a 12-Week Hybrid Analog–Digital Cognitive Training on Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults: A Pilot Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders. https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2025.24.4.301

Vancouver

Chung SS, Kim BR, Moon S, Kim GH. Effects of a 12-Week Hybrid Analog–Digital Cognitive Training on Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults: A Pilot Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders. 2025. doi:10.12779/dnd.2025.24.4.301. PMID: 41220868.

BibTeX

@article{chung2025-41220868,
  author  = {Chung, S. S. and Kim, Bori R. and Moon, Sooin and Kim, Geon Ha},
  title   = {{Effects of a 12-Week Hybrid Analog–Digital Cognitive Training on Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults: A Pilot Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial}},
  journal = {Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.12779/dnd.2025.24.4.301},
  pmid    = {41220868},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2025.24.4.301}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention trials

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →