Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Brain tissue and pathology

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Aggression in patients with dementia poses significant caregiving and clinical issues. In this work, fusion approaches—Early Fusion and Late Fusion—were compared to classify aggression using audio and visual signals. Early Fusion integrates the extracted features of the two modalities into one dataset before classification, while Late Fusion integrates the prediction probabilities of standalone audio and visual classifiers with a meta-classifier. Both models were tested using a Random Forest classifier with five-fold cross-validation, and the performance was compared on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and inference time. The results showcase that Late Fusion is superior to Early Fusion in terms of accuracy (0.876 vs. 0.828), recall (0.914 vs. 0.818), F1-score (0.867 vs. 0.835), and ROC-AUC score (0.970 vs. 0.922), proving more suitable for high-sensitivity use cases like healthcare and security. However, Early Fusion exhibited higher precision (0.852 vs. 0.824), indicating that in cases when false positives are a requirement, Early Fusion is preferable. Paired t-tests were applied for statistical comparison and indicate that precision alone is significantly different, with the advantage of Early Fusion. Late Fusion also performs slightly less in inference time, which makes it suitable for use in real-time systems. These findings provide significant information on multimodal fusion strategies and their applicability in the detection of aggressive behavior, which can contribute to the development of efficient monitoring systems for dementia care.

Key findings

Why it matters

This work compares two ways of combining audio and visual signals to classify aggression in dementia patients, and found that Late Fusion gave better accuracy, recall, F1-score and ROC-AUC, while Early Fusion gave slightly better precision. It is a technical classification study and does not test any treatment, cure or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 38 of 100.38 of 100 points earned62 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Applied Sciences)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Applied Sciences: journal h-index 230 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 7.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Μαρία Σαμαράκου: h-index 17 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens: institution h-index 859 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Galanakis, I., Soldatos, R. F., Karanikolas, N. Ν., Voulodimos, A. S., Voyiatzis, I., & Σαμαράκου, Μ. (2025). Early and Late Fusion for Multimodal Aggression Prediction in Dementia Patients: A Comparative Analysis. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115823

Vancouver

Galanakis I, Soldatos RF, Karanikolas NΝ, Voulodimos AS, Voyiatzis I, Σαμαράκου Μ. Early and Late Fusion for Multimodal Aggression Prediction in Dementia Patients: A Comparative Analysis. Applied Sciences. 2025. doi:10.3390/app15115823.

BibTeX

@article{galanakis2025-e7e8a3b1,
  author  = {Galanakis, Ioannis and Soldatos, Rigas Filippos and Karanikolas, Nikitas Ν. and Voulodimos, Athanasios S. and Voyiatzis, Ioannis and Σαμαράκου, Μαρία},
  title   = {{Early and Late Fusion for Multimodal Aggression Prediction in Dementia Patients: A Comparative Analysis}},
  journal = {Applied Sciences},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3390/app15115823},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115823}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Brain tissue and pathology

Similar studies

More on Brain tissue and pathology

See all studies in Brain tissue and pathology →