Home › Research › Caregiving
Documenting the need for teaching resourcefulness skills to family caregivers
Jaclene A Zauszniewski, John S Sweetko, Hang-Ying She, Nathanial Schreiner. Applied nursing research : ANR, 2022-08-27
Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology
Caregivers differed significantly on caregiver burden (F = 2.46; p = .014) and resourcefulness (F = 2.08; p = .038). Across the groups, average caregiver burden scores indicated severe to very severe burden with caregivers of persons with stroke scoring the highest (M = 26.33) and a moderate or greater need for resourcefulness with the greatest needs in caregivers of persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and dementia (M's = 74.83, 72.31, and 77.12). The findings suggest the need for intervention among all family caregiver groups to reduce their burden, with caregivers of persons with stroke showing greatest need. Specifically regarding resourcefulness training, the needs of family caregivers differed by care recipient condition. Using pre-determined cut scores on established, relevant measures provides support for proposing clinical trials, translation into practice, and intervention sustainability.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Zauszniewski, J. A., Sweetko, J. S., She, H.-Y., & Schreiner, N. (2022). Documenting the need for teaching resourcefulness skills to family caregivers. Applied nursing research : ANR. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151627
Vancouver
Zauszniewski JA, Sweetko JS, She H.-Y, Schreiner N. Documenting the need for teaching resourcefulness skills to family caregivers. Applied nursing research : ANR. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151627. PMID: 36116865.
BibTeX
@article{zauszniewski2022-36116865,
author = {Zauszniewski, Jaclene A and Sweetko, John S and She, Hang-Ying and Schreiner, Nathanial},
title = {{Documenting the need for teaching resourcefulness skills to family caregivers}},
journal = {Applied nursing research : ANR},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151627},
pmid = {36116865},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151627}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Caregivers differed significantly on caregiver burden (F = 2.46; p = .014) and resourcefulness (F = 2.08; p = .038).
- Across the groups, average caregiver burden scores indicated severe to very severe burden with caregivers of persons with stroke scoring the highest (M = 26.33) and a moderate or greater need for resourcefulness with the greatest needs in caregivers of persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and dementia (M's = 74.83, 72.31, and 77.12).
- The findings suggest the need for intervention among all family caregiver groups to reduce their burden, with caregivers of persons with stroke showing greatest need.
- Specifically regarding resourcefulness training, the needs of family caregivers differed by care recipient condition.
- Using pre-determined cut scores on established, relevant measures provides support for proposing clinical trials, translation into practice, and intervention sustainability.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Caregiving →
Study details
- Study designcross-sectional
- Evidence strengthHigh
How this study scored 55/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 31 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 55 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Applied nursing research : ANR) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 4 / 12 | A snapshot of people at one point in time |
| Strength of evidence | 5 / 5 | Rated “high” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 36116865) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 31 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 55 out of 100. |
| Total | 55 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Caregiving
Also tagged “caregiver”
195 studies in the library carry the topic tag “caregiver”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 195 tagged studies.