Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 71 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Genetics and APOE

To date, DNA methylation is the best characterized epigenetic modification in Alzheimer's disease. Involving the addition of a methyl group to the fifth carbon of the cytosine pyrimidine base, DNA methylation is generally thought to be associated with the silencing of gene expression. It has been hypothesized that epigenetics may mediate the interaction between genes and the environment in the manifestation of Alzheimer's disease, and therefore studies investigating DNA methylation could elucidate novel disease mechanisms. This chapter comprehensively reviews epigenomic studies, undertaken in human brain tissue and purified brain cell types, focusing on global methylation levels, candidate genes, epigenome wide approaches, and recent meta-analyses. We discuss key differentially methylated genes and pathways that have been highlighted to date, with a discussion on how new technologies and the integration of multiomic data may further advance the field.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Weymouth, L., Smith, A. R., & Lunnon, K. (2025). DNA Methylation in Alzheimer's Disease. Current topics in behavioral neurosciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2024_530

Vancouver

Weymouth L, Smith AR, Lunnon K. DNA Methylation in Alzheimer's Disease. Current topics in behavioral neurosciences. 2025. doi:10.1007/7854_2024_530. PMID: 39455499.

BibTeX

@article{weymouth2025-39455499,
  author  = {Weymouth, Luke and Smith, Adam R and Lunnon, Katie},
  title   = {{DNA Methylation in Alzheimer's Disease}},
  journal = {Current topics in behavioral neurosciences},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/7854_2024_530},
  pmid    = {39455499},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2024_530}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 71/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 40 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 71 of 100. Total 71 of 100.40 of the 56 points we could judge = 71 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 40 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 71 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Current topics in behavioral neurosciences)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39455499)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 40 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 40 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 71 out of 100.
Total 71 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “epigenetic”

274 studies in the library carry the topic tag “epigenetic”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 274 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →