Home › Research › Risk factors
Correlations between Cognitive Evaluation and Metabolic Syndrome
Andrei Cătălin Oprescu, Cristina Grosu, Walther Bild. Metabolites, 2023-04-17
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
One of the most common medical diseases is metabolic syndrome (MetS), which encompasses diabetes and obesity. It has a systemic effect, which has long-lasting consequences on the body that are still not fully understood. The objectives of the study were to investigate the association between the severity of metabolic imbalances, insulin resistance, leptin concentration, and the presence of cognitive disorders and to assess the possible protective role of some classes of drugs used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and dyslipidemia in order to identify a viable target in the near future. The study included 148 diabetic patients. Standardized tests for the evaluation of cognition, including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), were applied to all study participants. Serum concentrations of leptin and insulin were determined using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method (ELISA), and insulin resistance was calculated using the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). We found that MMSE and MoCA scores were associated with anthropometric parameters, and MoCA was associated with glycemic control parameters and leptin levels. Further research is needed in order to establish the magnitude of the relationship between metabolic syndrome components and cognitive decline in diabetic patients.
Key findings
- We found that MMSE and MoCA scores were associated with anthropometric parameters, and MoCA was associated with glycemic control parameters and leptin levels.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Risk factors, ranked →
Study details
- Participants148
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 50/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 28 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 50 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Metabolites) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 148 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37110228) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 28 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 28 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 50 out of 100. |
| Total | 50 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Oprescu, A. C., Grosu, C., & Bild, W. (2023). Correlations between Cognitive Evaluation and Metabolic Syndrome. Metabolites. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13040570
Vancouver
Oprescu AC, Grosu C, Bild W. Correlations between Cognitive Evaluation and Metabolic Syndrome. Metabolites. 2023. doi:10.3390/metabo13040570. PMID: 37110228.
BibTeX
@article{oprescu2023-37110228,
author = {Oprescu, Andrei Cătălin and Grosu, Cristina and Bild, Walther},
title = {{Correlations between Cognitive Evaluation and Metabolic Syndrome}},
journal = {Metabolites},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.3390/metabo13040570},
pmid = {37110228},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13040570}
}
Related studies in Risk factors
Also tagged “metabolic-syndrome”
304 studies in the library carry the topic tag “metabolic-syndrome”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 304 tagged studies.