Home › Research › Health systems and care delivery
Coding Options for Central Auditory Processing
Maureen A. Thompson. ASHA Leader, 2002-05-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Scenario #1—Use of test battery code 92557 Comprehensive audiometry threshold $44.53 92567 Tympanometry $19.91 92568 Acoustic Reflex Testing $14.12 92569 Acoustic Reflex Decay Testing $15.20 92506 Evaluation of speech, language, voice, communication, and/or auditory processing $94.84 Total $188.60 CPT 92506, a code that represents a battery of tests, has a higher work value (i.e., higher reimbursement rate) associated with it than CPT codes for individual CAP tests (e.g., Staggered Spondaic Word test). Diagnosis Codes There are a variety of ICD-9-CM codes that are appropriate when performing a CAP evaluation: 388.4 Other abnormal auditory perception 389.9 Hearing loss unspecified (If CAP results are normal) 389.12 Neural hearing loss 389.14 Central hearing loss 784.60 Symbolic dysfunction (i.e., cognitive impairment, language processing problems) This is commonly submitted by SLPs. 794.15 Abnormal auditory function study (if electrophysiological tests are performed) Maureen Thompson is ASHA’s director for private health plans advocacy.
Key findings
- Scenario #1—Use of test battery code 92557 Comprehensive audiometry threshold $44.53 92567 Tympanometry $19.91 92568 Acoustic Reflex Testing $14.12 92569 Acoustic Reflex Decay Testing $15.20 92506 Evaluation of speech, language, voice, communication, and/or auditory processing $94.84 Total $188.60 CPT 92506, a code that represents a battery of tests, has a higher work value (i.e., higher reimbursement rate) associated with it than CPT codes for individual CAP tests (e.g., Staggered Spondaic Word test).
- Diagnosis Codes There are a variety of ICD-9-CM codes that are appropriate when performing a CAP evaluation: 388.4 Other abnormal auditory perception 389.9 Hearing loss unspecified (If CAP results are normal) 389.12 Neural hearing loss 389.14 Central hearing loss 784.60 Symbolic dysfunction (i.e., cognitive impairment, language processing problems) This is commonly submitted by SLPs. 794.15 Abnormal auditory function study (if electrophysiological tests are performed) Maureen Thompson is ASHA’s director for private health plans advocacy.
Why it matters
This article discusses billing codes for central auditory processing evaluation. It does not address treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 24/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on institution's track record, so that was left out: it earned 23 of the 97 points we could judge it on, which is 24 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (ASHA Leader) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | ASHA Leader: journal h-index 30 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2002 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.0 citations a year over 26 year(s) since 2002 |
| Impact for its field and year | 1 / 6 | Cited 0.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Maureen A. Thompson: h-index 8 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 0 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete) |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 23 / 97 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 97 points we could judge it on is 24 out of 100. |
| Total | 24 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Thompson, M. A. (2002). Coding Options for Central Auditory Processing. ASHA Leader. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.bml.07092002.3
Vancouver
Thompson MA. Coding Options for Central Auditory Processing. ASHA Leader. 2002. doi:10.1044/leader.bml.07092002.3.
BibTeX
@article{thompson2002-e34a9218,
author = {Thompson, Maureen A.},
title = {{Coding Options for Central Auditory Processing}},
journal = {ASHA Leader},
year = {2002},
doi = {10.1044/leader.bml.07092002.3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.bml.07092002.3}
}