Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a particular form of dementiacharacterized by a steady decline in brain function and cognitive abilities, leading to memory loss, disorientation, and trouble doing daily tasks. It generally occurs in people aged over 65, and currently, there are around 55 million Alzheimer's patients which is becoming a growing concern, and the death rate due to AD has increased significantly. Existing ways of categorizing patients include medical records, cognitive testing, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which assist in diagnosing the condition, but a deep learning-based approach helps to discover Alzheimer's at an early stage. In this study, we propose an Alzheimer Recognition Ensemble Network (ALZENET) for classifying various stages of Alzheimer using MRI data. The study utilized the Kaggle MRI-based AD dataset, which comprised a total of 6,400 MRI images across four distinct classes. To address the significant class imbalance present in the dataset, the SMOTE technique was employed. Our ensemble model, which combines VGG16, Inception V3, and ResNet50 with a multi-layered CNN architecture, achieved a test accuracy of 97.31 %, significantly outperforming existing approaches in Alzheimer's disease classification. Additionally, a deep learning-based web application was developed to assist doctors in efficiently identifying different stages of Alzheimer's disease. This approach provides a promising tool for the early and accurate detection of Alzheimer's disease, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study combined several deep learning models to classify stages of Alzheimer's disease from MRI images, achieving 97.31% test accuracy, and developed a web application for doctors. It is a detection method only and does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 48/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 46 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 48 of 100. Total 48 of 100.46 of the 96 points we could judge = 48 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 46 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 48 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Telematics and Informatics Reports)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Telematics and Informatics Reports: journal h-index 36 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 6,400 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 40 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 13.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 25.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 40 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Khulna University of Engineering and Technology: institution h-index 158 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 46 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 46 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 48 out of 100.
Total 48 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Asaduzzaman, M., Alom, M. K., & Karim, M. E. (2025). ALZENET: Deep learning-based early prediction of Alzheimer's disease through magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Telematics and Informatics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100189

Vancouver

Asaduzzaman M, Alom MK, Karim ME. ALZENET: Deep learning-based early prediction of Alzheimer's disease through magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Telematics and Informatics Reports. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.teler.2025.100189.

BibTeX

@article{asaduzzaman2025-4f4d3a10,
  author  = {Asaduzzaman, Md and Alom, Md. Khorshed and Karim, Md. Ebtidaul},
  title   = {{ALZENET: Deep learning-based early prediction of Alzheimer's disease through magnetic resonance imaging analysis}},
  journal = {Telematics and Informatics Reports},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.teler.2025.100189},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100189}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →