Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 25 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The subscription based business model has significantly expanded beyond digital services, deeply penetrating the e-grocery and food delivery sectors. While these ecosystems offer substantial financial predictability and operational efficiency, emerging threats such as subscription fatigue threaten long-term customer retention. This study investigates the tipping point between perceived consumer value and cognitive overload within food subscription ecosystems, emphasizing the distinction between authentic loyalty and artificial retention. Employing a bibliometric approach, the research analyses 977 documents extracted from the Web of Science database up to 2025. Data analysis was performed utilizing the Biblioshiny and RStudio softwares, which revealed a life-cycle saturation of academic interest, largely propelled by the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings indicate a possible shift in the literature, moving from operational logistics toward consumer psychology, sustainability, and public health. Ultimately, the study concludes that sustainable food subscription models must transcend rigid contracts, leveraging indirect benefits and convenience to cultivate voluntary loyalty and minimize the financial burden perceived by consumers.

Key findings

Why it matters

This bibliometric analysis covers food subscription business models, not Alzheimer's disease, so it provides no information on treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's. It concludes that sustainable subscription models should rely on convenience and indirect benefits.

Study details

How this study scored 25/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 24 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 25 of 100. Total 25 of 100.24 of the 96 points we could judge = 25 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 24 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 25 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Business Excellence and Management)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 BUSINESS EXCELLENCE AND MANAGEMENT: journal h-index 12 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Alexandru-Mihai PÎRVU holds only 3 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Bucharest University of Economic Studies: institution h-index 147 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 24 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 25 out of 100.
Total 25 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Alexandru-Cătălin, V. L. A. D., & PÎRVU, A.-M. (2026). BEYOND THE GROCERY STORE: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF FOOD SUBSCRIPTION BUSINESS MODELS. Business Excellence and Management. https://doi.org/10.24818/beman/2026.16.2-06

Vancouver

Alexandru-Cătălin VLAD, PÎRVU A.-M. BEYOND THE GROCERY STORE: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF FOOD SUBSCRIPTION BUSINESS MODELS. Business Excellence and Management. 2026. doi:10.24818/beman/2026.16.2-06.

BibTeX

@article{alexandrucatalin2026-1d90c940,
  author  = {Alexandru-Cătălin, V. L. A. D. and PÎRVU, Alexandru-Mihai},
  title   = {{BEYOND THE GROCERY STORE: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF FOOD SUBSCRIPTION BUSINESS MODELS}},
  journal = {Business Excellence and Management},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.24818/beman/2026.16.2-06},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.24818/beman/2026.16.2-06}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Also in Risk factors

356 studies in the library are filed under Risk factors with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Risk factors hub.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →