Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract Palliative care (PC) has been shown to improve quality of care and life for nursing home (NH) residents. The PC needs and acuity of NH residents, particularly those with dementia, remain understudied. Using data from a large, NIA-funded trial evaluating PC in NHs, 655 residents with cognitive impairment were enrolled from 16 NHs across two states. NH staff, typically social workers and nurses, were trained as in-house PC leads. PC leads were asked to complete a PC screening on all enrolled residents to: identify needs; determine whether a PC consult is needed; and, if so, determine triage status for a consult visit. PC screening descriptives are presented and predictors of triage status were modeled. Initial screens were completed for 528 residents (80.6%) of all enrolled residents. Reasons for not being screened were resident discharge (e.g., to hospital) and death. Among six possible PC needs, 15% of residents had no identified needs, 42% had one need, and the remainder (42.8%) had ≥2 needs. The most prevalent needs were polypharmacy (58.1%), a lack of goals-of-care documentation (26.5%), functional decline/medical complexity (24.8%), unmanaged symptoms (19.7%), incongruent care (6.3%), and recent hospitalization (4.5%). Among those screened, a majority (n = 461, 87.3%) indicated a PC consult, with 5.4% of those cases being triaged as high priority. A greater number of needs (B=.42), polypharmacy (B=.33), and unmanaged symptoms (B=.31) significantly predicted higher triage priority (p<.001). Understanding residents’ PC needs can inform tailored policies and practices to address such gaps in care.

Key findings

Why it matters

Among 655 nursing home residents with cognitive impairment, the most common palliative care needs were polypharmacy, missing goals-of-care documentation and functional decline, and most screened residents were referred for a palliative care consult. This describes palliative care needs in nursing homes, not a treatment or cure for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 39 of 100.39 of 100 points earned61 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Innovation in Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Innovation in Aging: journal h-index 48 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 461 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Kathleen Tschantz Unroe: h-index 30 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Indiana University School of Medicine: institution h-index 784 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Cagle, J. G., Zhang, P., Becker, T. D., Floyd, A., Schwoyer-Morgan, T., Ridder, B., et al. (2025). Assessing Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Homes Among Residents With Cognitive Impairment: UPLIFT Trial Findings. Innovation in Aging. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3370

Vancouver

Cagle JG, Zhang P, Becker TD, Floyd A, Schwoyer-Morgan T, Ridder B, et al. Assessing Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Homes Among Residents With Cognitive Impairment: UPLIFT Trial Findings. Innovation in Aging. 2025. doi:10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3370.

BibTeX

@article{cagle2025-cf83ede5,
  author  = {Cagle, John G. and Zhang, Peiyuan and Becker, Todd D. and Floyd, Alex and Schwoyer-Morgan, Tracie and Ridder, Becky and Unroe, Kathleen Tschantz},
  title   = {{Assessing Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Homes Among Residents With Cognitive Impairment: UPLIFT Trial Findings}},
  journal = {Innovation in Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3370},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3370}
}

Related studies in End-of-life care

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →