Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, including stroke, systemic embolism, heart failure, and dementia. Timely diagnosis, accurate risk stratification, and personalized management are necessary to improving outcomes. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have expanded the potential for AF care, leveraging machine and deep learning approaches for enhanced detection, risk assessment, and therapeutic guidance. In this review, we summarize the clinical integration of AI into AF management across three domains. First, AI-enhanced electrocardiography (ECG) and wearable photoplethysmography devices allow early detection and long-term, non-invasive screening of AF, including identification of subclinical or paroxysmal AF from routine sinus rhythm recordings. Second, AI models have the potential to refine stroke risk stratification and personalize anticoagulation decision-making by integrating multidimensional clinical data, providing individualized risk assessments beyond traditional scoring systems like CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc. Finally, AI has been increasingly integrated into procedural planning and execution for AF ablation, helping to identify optimal ablation targets and predict post-procedural arrhythmia recurrence risk for a given rhythm control strategy, based on imaging and biosignal-derived features. In summary, the emerging integration of machine learning approaches into AF management highlights its transformative potential to offer earlier detection, more precise and personalized risk stratification, and tailored therapeutic strategies and patient follow up. Despite these advancements, the clinical implementation of AI in AF management remains primitive, requiring large-scale validation, supplemental clinical oversight, and regulatory guidance to ensure safe and effective integration into our daily practices.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Chatterjee, K., Verma, A., Godinez, E., Gonzalez, D. J., Devathu, R., Alhusseini, M. I., et al. (2026). Artificial intelligence in atrial fibrillation – Timely diagnosis, risk assessment and personalized management. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2026.01.011

Vancouver

Chatterjee K, Verma A, Godinez E, Gonzalez DJ, Devathu R, Alhusseini MI, et al. Artificial intelligence in atrial fibrillation – Timely diagnosis, risk assessment and personalized management. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ipej.2026.01.011. PMID: 41611206.

BibTeX

@article{chatterjee2026-41611206,
  author  = {Chatterjee, Kushal and Verma, Aaryamaan and Godinez, Erick and Gonzalez, Daniel Joseph and Devathu, Rahul and Alhusseini, Mahmood I. and Fazal, Muhammad and Baykaner, Tina},
  title   = {{Artificial intelligence in atrial fibrillation – Timely diagnosis, risk assessment and personalized management}},
  journal = {Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.ipej.2026.01.011},
  pmid    = {41611206},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2026.01.011}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review describes how AI could help detect atrial fibrillation earlier and guide its treatment, and it notes that atrial fibrillation is linked to dementia among other conditions. It does not test whether treating atrial fibrillation with AI-guided care prevents or cures Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 38 of 100.38 of 100 points earned62 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal: journal h-index 25 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Tina Baykaner: h-index 25 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Stanford University: institution h-index 2,684 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41611206)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also in Digital health tools

178 studies in the library are filed under Digital health tools with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Digital health tools hub.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →