Home › Research › Drug development
An evaluation of hydromethylthionine as a treatment option for Alzheimer's disease
Nader Nael Hashweh, Zachary Bartochowski, Rita Khoury, George T Grossberg. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2020-02-08
Topic: Drug trials: efficacy and safety
INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major cause of morbidity worldwide and its prevalence is expected to rise. Previous studies involving compounds that target the accumulation of amyloid β protein have been unsuccessful, renewing interest in therapies directed against intracellular deposits of tau proteins. Derived from methylene blue, hydromethylthionine is a tau aggregation inhibitor that recently emerged as a promising disease-modifying treatment for AD. AREAS COVERED: Herein, the authors cover the chemistry, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of hydromethylthionine and its oxidized form methylthionine chloride (MTC) that was first studied, as well as clinical efficacy and safety of hydromethylthionine in the treatment of mild to moderate AD. EXPERT OPINION: Randomized clinical trials with hydromethylthionine failed to show any impact of the doses used on the disease course. Data analysis from a non-randomized cohort showed that a smaller dose of the drug previously thought to be ineffective and used as placebo, prescribed as monotherapy rather than as add-on to AD approved symptomatic therapies may slow cognitive decline. This finding was further confirmed by a pharmacokinetic analysis study showing a dose/response relationship with doses around 16 mg daily. Future trials need to study the pharmacological properties of hydromethylthionine and ascertain the optimal safe and effective dose to be used.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Hashweh, N. N., Bartochowski, Z., Khoury, R., & Grossberg, G. T. (2020). An evaluation of hydromethylthionine as a treatment option for Alzheimer's disease. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2020.1719066
Vancouver
Hashweh NN, Bartochowski Z, Khoury R, Grossberg GT. An evaluation of hydromethylthionine as a treatment option for Alzheimer's disease. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2020. doi:10.1080/14656566.2020.1719066. PMID: 32037892.
BibTeX
@article{hashweh2020-32037892,
author = {Hashweh, Nader Nael and Bartochowski, Zachary and Khoury, Rita and Grossberg, George T},
title = {{An evaluation of hydromethylthionine as a treatment option for Alzheimer's disease}},
journal = {Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1080/14656566.2020.1719066},
pmid = {32037892},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2020.1719066}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Data analysis from a non-randomized cohort showed that a smaller dose of the drug previously thought to be ineffective and used as placebo, prescribed as monotherapy rather than as add-on to AD approved symptomatic therapies may slow cognitive decline.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthHigh
How this study scored 46/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multicenter collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 46 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 5 / 5 | Rated “high” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32037892) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 26 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 46 out of 100. |
| Total | 46 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “phosphorylation”
389 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylation”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 389 tagged studies.