Home › Research › Drug development
Alpha-1 noradrenergic receptor stimulation impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function
Arnsten AF, Mathew R, Ubriani R, Taylor JR, Li BM.. Biological psychiatry, 1999-01-01
Topic: Drug trials: efficacy and safety
Background Many neuropsychiatric disorders are associated with high levels of noradrenergic turnover, and most antipsychotic medications have alpha-1 adrenoceptor blocking properties, yet little is known about alpha-1 influences on higher cortical function. Methods The alpha-1 adrenergic agonist, phenylephrine, was infused into the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of rats (0.1 microgram/0.5 microL) performing a spatial working memory task, delayed alternation. The phenylephrine response was challenged with coinfusion of the alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist, uripidil (0.01 microgram), or with a dose of lithium chloride (4 mEq/kg, i.p., 18 hours) known to suppress phosphotidylinositol (PI) turnover, the second messenger pathway coupled to alpha-1 adrenoceptors. Results Phenylephrine infusions in PFC markedly impaired delayed alternation performance. The phenylephrine response was reversed by coinfusion of uripidil, or by pretreatment with lithium, consistent with actions at alpha-1 adrenoceptors coupled to a PI pathway. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that alpha-1 adrenoceptor stimulation in the PFC impairs cognitive function. Excessive stimulation of alpha-1 adrenoceptors may contribute to PFC deficits (e.g., distractibility, impulsivity) in disorders such as mania, dementia, and anxiety associated with high noradrenergic turnover.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Arnsten, A. F., Mathew, R., Ubriani, R., Taylor, JR., & Li, B. M. (1999). Alpha-1 noradrenergic receptor stimulation impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function. Biological psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00296-0
Vancouver
Arnsten AF, Mathew R, Ubriani R, Taylor JR, Li BM. Alpha-1 noradrenergic receptor stimulation impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function. Biological psychiatry. 1999. doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00296-0. PMID: 9894572.
BibTeX
@article{arnsten1999-9894572,
author = {Arnsten, A. F. and Mathew, R. and Ubriani, R. and Taylor, JR. and Li, B. M.},
title = {{Alpha-1 noradrenergic receptor stimulation impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function}},
journal = {Biological psychiatry},
year = {1999},
doi = {10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00296-0},
pmid = {9894572},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00296-0}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Background Many neuropsychiatric disorders are associated with high levels of noradrenergic turnover, and most antipsychotic medications have alpha-1 adrenoceptor blocking properties, yet little is known about alpha-1 influences on higher cortical function.
- Results Phenylephrine infusions in PFC markedly impaired delayed alternation performance.
- Conclusions These findings demonstrate that alpha-1 adrenoceptor stimulation in the PFC impairs cognitive function.
- Excessive stimulation of alpha-1 adrenoceptors may contribute to PFC deficits (e.g., distractibility, impulsivity) in disorders such as mania, dementia, and anxiety associated with high noradrenergic turnover.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Biological psychiatry) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1999 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 9894572) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “late-life-depression”
139 studies in the library carry the topic tag “late-life-depression”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 139 tagged studies.