Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Saito et al developed a novel amyloid precursor protein (APP) knock-in mouse model (APP NL-G-F ) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) to overcome the problem of overexpression of APP in available transgenic mouse models. However, this new mouse model for AD is not fully characterized age-dependently with respect to behavioral and biochemical changes. Therefore, in the present study, we performed an age-dependent behavioral and biochemical characterization of this newly developed mouse model. Here, we used 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month-old APP NL-G-F and C57BL/6J mice. We used a separate cohort of animals at each age point. Morris water maze, object recognition, and fear-conditioning tests were used for the assessment of learning and memory functions and open-field test to measure the general locomotor activity of mice. After each testing point, we perfused the mice and collected the brain for immunostaining. We performed the immunostaining for amyloid burden (4G8), glial fibrillary acidic protein, choline acetyltransferase, and tyrosine hydroxylase. The results of the present study indicate that APP NL-G-F mice showed age-dependent memory impairments with maximum impairment at the age of 12 months. These mice showed memory impairment in Morris water maze and fear conditioning tests when they were 6 months old, whereas, in object recognition test, memory deficit was found in 9-month-old mice. APP NL-G-F mice age dependently showed an increase in amyloid load in different brain regions. However, no amyloid pathology was found in 3-month-old APP NL-G-F mice. Choline acetyltransferase neurons in medial septum-diagonal band complex and tyrosine hydroxylase neurons in locus coeruleus were decreased significantly in APP NL-G-F mice. This mouse model also indicated an age-dependent increase in glial fibrillary acidic protein load. It can be concluded from the results that the APP NL-G-F mouse model may be used to explore the Aβ hypothesis, molecular, and cellular mechanisms involved in AD pathology and to screen the therapeutic potential compounds for the treatment of AD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Mehla, J., Lacoursiere, S. G., Lapointe, V., McNaughton, B. L., Sutherland, R. J., McDonald, R. J., et al. (2019). Age-dependent behavioral and biochemical characterization of single APP knock-in mouse (APPNL-G-F/NL-G-F) model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiology of aging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.026

Vancouver

Mehla J, Lacoursiere SG, Lapointe V, McNaughton BL, Sutherland RJ, McDonald RJ, et al. Age-dependent behavioral and biochemical characterization of single APP knock-in mouse (APPNL-G-F/NL-G-F) model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiology of aging. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.026. PMID: 30508733.

BibTeX

@article{mehla2019-30508733,
  author  = {Mehla, J. and Lacoursiere, S. G. and Lapointe, V. and McNaughton, B. L. and Sutherland, R. J. and McDonald, R. J. and Mohajerani, M. H.},
  title   = {{Age-dependent behavioral and biochemical characterization of single APP knock-in mouse (APPNL-G-F/NL-G-F) model of Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Neurobiology of aging},
  year    = {2019},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.026},
  pmid    = {30508733},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.026}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 24 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 41 of 100. Total 41 of 100.24 of the 58 points we could judge = 41 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neurobiology of aging)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2019 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “mouse”) — scores zero
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 30508733)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 24 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100.
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “sup”

3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “sup”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →